whodini
Conan OOOOOOO"BRIEN!
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2006
- Messages
- 17,950
- Reaction score
- 191
could you post a clearer image? kind of hard to see brain details
Sorry. I screencapped it off my Beta copy.
Thanks John Elliott!
Styleforum was one of the first digital communities to embrace John Elliott, and in recognition of that, John Elliott has extended to our comunuty a monthly discount to fans of the brand who engage here. Simply enter the code for SF-OCT-15
Check out all of their new arrivals here
STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
could you post a clearer image? kind of hard to see brain details
I wonder: To what extent does the quality of the actual photography really "make" the photo, and lend credit to a fit that otherwise either wouldn't be as good, or alternatively take a solid look and make it look mediocre/bad because of a bad photo?
Of course some can post a pic of themselves wearing a burlap sack with white tube socks in a pitch black room and get props from their bros. But that's just ridic, and I digress.
Poster personality/ reputation plays a big role as well. Also groupthink taking place where if someone with a big rep will say "that fit sucks" everyone else might look at it differently (i.e. trying to find something wrong with it) than if the person had said "wow doap fit."
Everyone looks better in real life I'd be willing to bet.
Well at least it appears that the forum consensus is that higher quality fit pics are indeed a good thing.
lookbook.nu