Do photoskillz make for better WAYW fits?

Discussion in 'Streetwear and Denim' started by Master-Classter, Dec 1, 2010.

  1. Master-Classter

    Master-Classter Senior member

    Messages:
    8,508
    Likes Received:
    1,237
    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2007
    Location:
    Toronto, Canada
    I wonder: To what extent does the quality of the actual photography really "make" the photo, and lend credit to a fit that otherwise either wouldn't be as good, or alternatively take a solid look and make it look mediocre/bad because of a bad photo? As I look at certain WAYW posters like Berlin Report, Mellow Fellow, Aeglus, etc and then in contrast guys like Kunk, Hendrix, and nicelynice, while both groups often have interesting fits and styles, the first group has way better pictures. It's easier to see the fit, colors, textures, etc and the second group probably doesn't get as much credit as they deserve. I find I always love the pics from Mellow Fellow, or Berlin Report, but I wonder how much of that is just really nice crisp photos with good, but not really excellent styles. An alternatively, i suspect that guys like Magician or Fuji, or a million other guys would have more praise if they had better pics.
     




  2. lmaozedong

    lmaozedong Senior member

    Messages:
    3,456
    Likes Received:
    4,048
    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2009
    As I look at certain WAYW posters like Berlin Report, Mellow Fellow, Aeglus, etc and then in contrast guys like Kunk, Hendrix, and nicelynice, while both groups often have interesting fits and styles, the first group has way better pictures. It's easier to see the fit, colors, textures, etc and the second group probably doesn't get as much credit as they deserve.

    [​IMG]
     


  3. Master-Classter

    Master-Classter Senior member

    Messages:
    8,508
    Likes Received:
    1,237
    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2007
    Location:
    Toronto, Canada
    MEh, I had a feeling people were going to jump on the specific posters mentioned but to not point out anyone in particular would have made this all way too theoretical. You got better examples of each group?
     


  4. inter71

    inter71 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    64
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2010
    Location:
    Toronto
    Great point!!! overall, attention to details (quality pictures) would definietly change some SFers perception.
     


  5. Dewey

    Dewey Senior member

    Messages:
    3,485
    Likes Received:
    28
    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2007
    Some details look better in pictures, than they do in real life.

    I also think the WAYWN can be more about making pictures than poasters seem to realize.
     


  6. whodini

    whodini Conan OOOOOOO"BRIEN!

    Messages:
    18,144
    Likes Received:
    175
    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2006
    Location:
    Loretto, KY
    Let me get this straight: a thoughtfully-composed photo in which the viewer can more readily discern finer details makes for a better visual and critical experience than a photo that appears more like a Mescaline-inspired portrait drawn by Hellen Keller on an Etch-a-Sketch than some dude wearing J Crew in front of his bathroom mirror that hasn't been cleaned since the Taft administration? [​IMG]
     


  7. brad-t

    brad-t Bae Blade

    Messages:
    18,535
    Likes Received:
    19,353
    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2008


  8. Kvc06

    Kvc06 Senior member

    Messages:
    2,500
    Likes Received:
    128
    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2009
    Location:
    Chicago
    Absolutely makes a HUGE difference
     


  9. Master-Classter

    Master-Classter Senior member

    Messages:
    8,508
    Likes Received:
    1,237
    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2007
    Location:
    Toronto, Canada
    What I'm alluding to is if really great photography actually gives people credit way beyond the true quality of what they're wearing (Ie are people always praising Berlin and Mellow because of great photos), and on the oposite side are there posters who probably look way better in real life by their photos let them down so nobody gives them any credit (like Fuji or even Kvc06 sometimes)
     


  10. XeF4

    XeF4 Senior member

    Messages:
    747
    Likes Received:
    4
    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2008
    Yep. I think a lot of people spend too much time on getting the right background, making sure the lighting is right, looking away from the camera at the perfect angle, ect, ect to get the perfect photo. But it does provide good pictures, which are good for deciding what you like and what you don't like better.
     


  11. Kvc06

    Kvc06 Senior member

    Messages:
    2,500
    Likes Received:
    128
    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2009
    Location:
    Chicago
    Everyone looks better in real life I'd be willing to bet.
    Photo has so much to do with it.
    In a photo most people look so unnatural and the garments aren't in action so it probably looks much worse.
     


  12. macuser3of5

    macuser3of5 Senior member

    Messages:
    2,543
    Likes Received:
    12
    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2006
    Let me get this straight: a thoughtfully-composed photo in which the viewer can more readily discern finer details makes for a better visual and critical experience than a photo that appears more like a Mescaline-inspired portrait drawn by Hellen Keller on an Etch-a-Sketch than some dude wearing J Crew in front of his bathroom mirror that hasn't been cleaned since the Taft administration?

    [​IMG]

    could you post a clearer image? kind of hard to see brain details [​IMG]
     


  13. Master-Classter

    Master-Classter Senior member

    Messages:
    8,508
    Likes Received:
    1,237
    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2007
    Location:
    Toronto, Canada
    or on the MC side, there's guys like NYRanger who's pic quality isn't anything special but the context makes the shot. Then guys like UrbanComposite who has "styled" photos that sometimes probably distract from the actual fit. Then guys like Foo whose shots are great in terms of photography, but also so stark in context that they almost detract from the clothes. Then Cravate_Noire and LabelKing where the shots are nothing special but the lifestyle makes the clothes matter half as much, even though they're actually at the top of the game. Or what about Phat Guido, he seems to have a mix of high lifestyle and great clothes and great photography, so is he the whole package or do his photo skills give him more credit then he deserves?
     


  14. whodini

    whodini Conan OOOOOOO"BRIEN!

    Messages:
    18,144
    Likes Received:
    175
    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2006
    Location:
    Loretto, KY
    4/10 -- tried too hard there who
    Maybe my post needed more Fair Isle vest?
    What I'm alluding to is if really great photography actually gives people credit way beyond the true quality of what they're wearing (Ie are people always praising Berlin and Mellow because of great photos), and on the oposite side are there posters who probably look way better in real life by their photos let them down so nobody gives them any credit (like Fuji or even Kvc06 sometimes)
    [​IMG]

    Berlin and Mellow are two users who people praise because of fits and then photography. There are plenty of other users that are much loved with much average photography skills.
     


Share This Page

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by