G & G Finishing Imperfections: Acceptable?

[cdmoore1855]



Because if you sell an exclusive product, you don't want it to pop up all over the internet at discount prices. That pisses of your dealers who have brick-and-mortar stores making them less willing to sell your product.

I understand this Roy, the issue would be they may have been sold at a lower price, which I agree would upset people

 

[cdmoore1855]



Vintage Rioja is IMO G&G best calf tone, i have a new pair of BS's coming in it

How about a classic cap toe in Vintage Rioja ?

 

[luk-cha]

Vintage Rioja is IMO G&G best calf tone, i have a new pair of BS's coming in it

How about a classic cap toe in Vintage Rioja ?

you been talking about me?

 

[cdmoore1855]



you been talking about me?

to who ?

 

[luk-cha]

you been talking about me?

to who ?

thats what i am trying to find out

 

[cdmoore1855]

only talking about you to you, why do you think I have been talking about you to someone else ?

 

[Cravate_Noire]



I find it weird that people will pay a premium for things made by hand, and then complain when the handmade items have the types of inconsistencies and imperfections that are.... generally found on things made by hand

Hm, I find it weird that nowadays handwork is defined by the inconsitency it supposedly is linked with...
On crust leather it is OK to a certain degree, but that is too much.
As for suits I have some that received the compliment that they looked "industrial". Not too many tailors left that say "what's handmade, that's that what you don't see".
Though I like both concepts; just saying.

 

[luk-cha]



only talking about you to you, why do you think I have been talking about you to someone else ?

how sweet!

 

[Cravate_Noire]

I'm on the way to the airport, so answered to the thread before I did see the refinished version.
I think that one can objectively say that this went really well! There were imperfections and now they're gone, obviously remade at the vendors/G&G's cost (referring to fritzl's comment that that he would not see a difference, also I think that lack of charcater or whatever is sheer subjetctive and has not much to do with the fact that they resolved the issue).

 

[fritzl]



referring to fritzl's comment that that he would not see a difference, also I think that lack of charcater or whatever is sheer subjetctive and has not much to do with the fact that they resolved the issue.

p. thank you for pointing that out. actually, i was a bit ironic.

customer satisfaction is an important issue.

 

[Cravate_Noire]

I heard some nasty things today from someone who is in the business and who I consider to be in the know .

 

[Roy]



I heard some nasty things today from someone who is in the business and who I consider to be in the know .

About what?

 

[Knowledge is King]



I heard some nasty things today from someone who is in the business and who I consider to be in the know .

care to divulge? Otherwise, my response is.....yay? We're glad to know that you know something? It seems like you're implying some disparaging situation that G&G wouldn't like to be shared. Imagine if you walked into a real conversation and said this without elaborating. Kind of bratty/douchey no?

 

[Will]



He is sour with G&G because he was rejected to purchase a bulk to sell on his online store.

My god, you are an idiot. You should gossip about things you were involved in so you don't make a fool of yourself.

I told G&G I wasn't going to sell their shoes.Fortunately if you also want to drag G&G's name through the mud I saved the email thread between myself and G&G and will be happy to supply it to a neutral third party who can announce which of us is correct.

 

[Matis]

May be you should, sir, as an Etonian.