toothsomesound
Distinguished Member
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2008
- Messages
- 5,096
- Reaction score
- 440
hey for what it's worth I like that jil bag a lot
STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
Fortunately the exchange rate is not quite that bad yet. I paid $364 for two tees (delivered).
These creepers everyone keeps salivating over appear to smash 3 different conflicting aesthetics together: dressy dandy, yacht club preppy, and sporty sneakers.
not everyone can kop MMM boots and have a car, ivory tower bro
If you're under about 5'10 and you wear those, everybody will be laughing behind your back as it looks like an attempt to boost your height.
Instead what we have is an ungainly shoe with largely no identity and no negative stereotypes. Add to this neutral palette Jude Law wearing them and and influential boutiques selling them, helping everyone to associate positive imagery with the design. Suddenly they're fashionable!
I'm going to agree with BB1 - the Prada Creepers were slammed by a number of influential critic, and I think, for good reason. The shoe is a brogue sitting on top of an espadrille midsole, on top of an old school runners sole. It's just plain muddy design.
these are close to the trendiest shoes I've ever seen. i dont think these will be 'cool' in 3 months.
People have been salivating over the Prada creepers for more than 3 months. If Skechers made the exact same shoe I would buy it. Dumb argument, Prada doesn't put **** out that is SF approved either
how many mmm boots do you have now regis? i think i recall you having a few pairs.