TheWraith
Distinguished Member
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2009
- Messages
- 4,951
- Reaction score
- 1,119
Indeed. I recently had a vintage 1960s Date watch that looked very similar to that (though with a black dial), which I loved the look of, but I got a rash from the extra nickel content in the steel of that time, so I sold it. I must say, though, that DJ looks even better. Very nice watch that
I don't think I'd have a problem with a manual wind.
Definitely. It all comes down to personal preference in the end anyway. I do like the movement of the new ATs, though.
Indeed. Sadly not mine, but I've posted that pic a few times over the years as I really like this model (1600). Baton markers, plain bezel, lug holes and brushed Oyster bracelet: Just perfect.
Indeed. I recently had a vintage 1960s Date watch that looked very similar to that (though with a black dial), which I loved the look of, but I got a rash from the extra nickel content in the steel of that time, so I sold it. I must say, though, that DJ looks even better. Very nice watch that
I don't think I'd have a problem with a manual wind.
I think the comparisons have almost ceased to be of equivalent watches: the 43mm AT - on its steel bracelet, with 15 bar water resistance blah blah, is just so much like a pure sports watch. In that context, the extra bits and bobs on the dial don't jar as much with me. Conversely, the lovely blue and the smooth bezel de-sport it just enough for me to find it pretty, too. It's complicated. And logic has its limits.
Definitely. It all comes down to personal preference in the end anyway. I do like the movement of the new ATs, though.
Last edited: