the shah
OG Yamamoto
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2008
- Messages
- 17,566
- Reaction score
- 12,867
it's not that claiming sexless=misogynist , but that sexless is necessarily unattractive, and that somehow the stated purpose of women's fashion is to enhance some perceived and singular notion of sexiness, catering to this fellow's every whim.
damn you ice cold
also , the cognitive flops aren't limited to just this but that's another story
I think you should be able to make the claim that a sexless collection has no place in fashion without being called a misogynist. Although I don't think that's what's going on with this show.
it's not that claiming sexless=misogynist , but that sexless is necessarily unattractive, and that somehow the stated purpose of women's fashion is to enhance some perceived and singular notion of sexiness, catering to this fellow's every whim.
I wouldn't want to date anyone in the WAYWT thread (no offense friends)
damn you ice cold
also , the cognitive flops aren't limited to just this but that's another story
Last edited: