STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
What the hell are some of you complaining about? It's the same exact boot. The only reason it appears sleeker is because the W+H version is pre-distressed and soaked. You could achieve the same look yourself if you wanted. Plus, I have pics of the W+H boots after some wear and they start to loose some of the look they where giving by W+H.
Easily one of the funniest threads to follow right now on SF.
I love this part. Can I distress and soak a redwing to make it look like a vass u-last?
I love this part. Can I distress and soak a redwing to make it look like a vass u-last?
Easily one of the funniest threads to follow right now on SF.
this is from when i first got my boots and i f**ked with the toe box and vamp.
What the hell are you smoking? The W+H boot is the SAME boot as the one we are talking about. Dayton sends them to W+H and they do their magic on them. Dayton and W+H admit this and have no reason to deny or hide it as a fact.
Are you ok dude? If you read it again it makes perfect sense.
It looks like the soles are thicker than on the w+h. The pair I bought last summer from dayton looks much slimmer due to having a thinner leather sole.