Spehsmonkey
Distinguished Member
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2014
- Messages
- 1,124
- Reaction score
- 2,704
Really don't see anything innovative and how beauty and craftsmanship are different. I'm confused by his use of "class." Wearing sashiko dyed shirts might be classy as in stylish, but never as strong of a signifier of social class as even Brooks Brother which targets a much more specific culture of men and lifestyle, and their implied social status. All I've seen are that labels whose reputation and aesthetic blatantly evoke either the nouveau riche or old rich are generally frowned upon. Calling internet fashion a "class-centric" project apart from the egalitarian nature of the forum itself seems a bit ridiculous. There are still conservative factions of fashion forums like CM and SZ in its own way. The biggest thing, in my opinion, that's changed in the past ten or so years is the rise of fast fashion.
As for the issue of how class dynamics and signifiers of class get mixed around in the men's fashion world, think about:
- upper-middle class guys wearing workwear when they never meaningfully interact with the construction worker building the luxury condo next to their apartment
- discussing suits, of which the low-tier of acceptability are $500 (a HUGE expenditure for most Americans)
- $100 Nonnative T-shirts designed to look "broken in"
- obsessing over tiny signifiers of "quality" only accessible to certain income levels and noticeable by certain levels of taste
Today, looking like a kinda rich guy dressed like a poor guy is pretty in among some kinda rich guys. Looking like a poor guy dressed like a poor guy is just not the same...it might be on a blog as inspiration for rich guys...And this scenario is only the most obvious example, since the workwear craze (which is alive and well in many blogs and even parts of this forum) is so patently a topsy-turvy class fantasy thing.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cultural_capital