JeffB
Member
- Joined
- Nov 23, 2007
- Messages
- 7
- Reaction score
- 0
Since it seems that getting a good "fit" with clothing in general often involves giving the illusion of accentuating more "positive" aspects of a person's build while minimizing the more "negative" aspects of a person's build (for example a somewhat "baggy" look would make a heavy person look even heavier, whereas on a skinny person it probably won't look as bad), I have the following question. How does this relate to the fit of a pair of pants, especially concerning the "rise" in a pair of pants, and where the legs of the pants break?
Specifically I have a build that is unfortunately longer in the trunk and shorter in the legs. So with this is mind would a pair of pants with a short "rise" (say 8-9")accentuate the shorter proportion of my legs? And therefore I would probably want pants with a longer rise (say more like 10-11")? Mind you I don't like pants with say a 12" or higher rise. Makes me look like Fred Mertz from "I Love Lucy"...
And though I tend to like the look of pants that don't reach the shoe, should I probably avoid this look for the same reason?
Thanks!
Specifically I have a build that is unfortunately longer in the trunk and shorter in the legs. So with this is mind would a pair of pants with a short "rise" (say 8-9")accentuate the shorter proportion of my legs? And therefore I would probably want pants with a longer rise (say more like 10-11")? Mind you I don't like pants with say a 12" or higher rise. Makes me look like Fred Mertz from "I Love Lucy"...
And though I tend to like the look of pants that don't reach the shoe, should I probably avoid this look for the same reason?
Thanks!