• I'm happy to introduce the Styleforum Happy Hour, our brand new podcast featuring lively discussion about menswear and the fashion industry. In the inaugural edition, a discussion of what's going on in retail today. Please check it out on the Journal. All episodes will be also be available soon on your favorite podcast platform.

  • Styleforum Gives - Holiday Charity Auction 8: Cuir de Russie card case from Equus Leather

    We are very proud to present this year's edition of the Styleforum Holiday Charity Auctions, this year in support of the Ronald McDonald House Charities of Spokane (www.rmhcspokane.org). Each Auction lasts 24 hours. Please follow and bid on all the auctions.

    The 8th auction is for a Cuir de Russie card case from Equus Leather. Please bid often and generously here

    Fok and the Styleforum Team.

  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

pants fit

JeffB

Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2007
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Since it seems that getting a good "fit" with clothing in general often involves giving the illusion of accentuating more "positive" aspects of a person's build while minimizing the more "negative" aspects of a person's build (for example a somewhat "baggy" look would make a heavy person look even heavier, whereas on a skinny person it probably won't look as bad), I have the following question. How does this relate to the fit of a pair of pants, especially concerning the "rise" in a pair of pants, and where the legs of the pants break?

Specifically I have a build that is unfortunately longer in the trunk and shorter in the legs. So with this is mind would a pair of pants with a short "rise" (say 8-9")accentuate the shorter proportion of my legs? And therefore I would probably want pants with a longer rise (say more like 10-11")? Mind you I don't like pants with say a 12" or higher rise. Makes me look like Fred Mertz from "I Love Lucy"...

And though I tend to like the look of pants that don't reach the shoe, should I probably avoid this look for the same reason?

Thanks!
 

Aluan

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 27, 2008
Messages
98
Reaction score
1
What you call "fit" is what I think of as styling.

To me, proper "fit" is ultimately concerned with having no folds or pulls or tight spots or overly excess parts of fabric. So you can have something that fits but with the wrong styling, and it'll still look wrong.

A longer rise will make your legs look longer. Cuffs are generally accepted to shorten the legs, and so will pants that don't reach the shoe.

So I'd suggest getting a pair of pants with a higher rise, no cuffs, and just a slight break.
 

mensimageconsultant

Distinguished Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2006
Messages
4,615
Reaction score
122
Pretty classic example of why people opt for consultations. No pictures, little sense of your style or proportions. Let's assume you tuck your shirt in. Aluan gives advice that probably will work to a point. The rise issue would better be described as wear pants at the natural waist and avoid excess fabric below the crotch. Stick to straight leg pants. Also, slim fit (relative to your legs) probably would help.
 

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by

Featured Sponsor

How many pairs of shoes do you own?

  • 1 - 4

    Votes: 30 3.6%
  • 5 - 10

    Votes: 143 17.4%
  • 11 - 20

    Votes: 270 32.8%
  • 21 - 30

    Votes: 130 15.8%
  • 31 - 40

    Votes: 70 8.5%
  • 41 - 50

    Votes: 48 5.8%
  • 51 - 60

    Votes: 25 3.0%
  • 61 - 70

    Votes: 22 2.7%
  • 71 - 80

    Votes: 17 2.1%
  • 81 - 90

    Votes: 7 0.9%
  • 91 - 100

    Votes: 9 1.1%
  • 100+

    Votes: 52 6.3%

Related Threads

Forum statistics

Threads
429,099
Messages
9,228,597
Members
193,720
Latest member
swtxzdj
Top