STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
ann ds aren't underrated. they're just not worth 800+ dollars at retail. in a better world where markups aren't so ridiculous, i'd probably be willing to pay around 250-350 for them.
ann ds aren't underrated. they're just not worth 800+ dollars at retail. in a better world where markups aren't so ridiculous, i'd probably be willing to pay around 250-350 for them.
I mean underrated in the sense that they don't really go further than the SZ or Ann devotees, but I agree, they're def not worth more than $500. then again few shoes are. They do usually get down there in price though.. i believe last barneys sale they had plenty in stock in all sizes at around $250 and even that didn't really move too many people.
i dunno, i doubt i'm either of those and yet i wear them easily ... agree with nahneun abt price
conceptual and I are pierre gang for life. They make some comfy ass shoes, and despite their lack of flair they usually look good in all the fits I wear em with.
i've had all of them and i would rate it like - chucks, jv, pierre, cp, mmm and lanvin being the most comfortable.are they comfy? I scoped a pair a while back I should've grabbed but I'm not familiar with the fit... can you compare to Lanvin, CP, Chucks, JP and/or MMM? Thx!