Nickd
Distinguished Member
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2016
- Messages
- 1,180
- Reaction score
- 1,698
82 is less accommodating in the toe box than 202.I might try 82 next time. I have 202
Thanks - interesting to know. I have E-202 and it seems a bit tight in the toe box. I am waiting on a pair of F-202 which might suit my feet better, but if 82 is more accommodating then I think I’ll go for that next time.
The F width may be the solution - when going up a width fitting in EG you will gain at least as much width as you would going up a half size.