• Hi, I'm the owner and main administrator of Styleforum. If you find the forum useful and fun, please help support it by buying through the posted links on the forum. Our main, very popular sales thread, where the latest and best sales are listed, are posted HERE

    Purchases made through some of our links earn a commission for the forum and allow us to do the work of maintaining and improving it. Finally, thanks for being a part of this community. We realize that there are many choices today on the internet, and we have all of you to thank for making Styleforum the foremost destination for discussions of menswear and fashion.
  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

jischwar

Distinguished Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2012
Messages
3,406
Reaction score
5,202
I very much appreciate the help as I can't get to Leffot easily and there's no NJ stores that carry them to try on.

I reworled the lacing on the inverness and took photis of the toe markings from trying them on.

I just tried the Harogates on again with thicker socks. Like, they're fitted but not too tight. Like ny left toe is grazing the toe box alittle but isn't tight or painful. My toes feel like they can't relax 100%, moreso at 90, so maybe it's a vertical issue. If the toebox was too small I'd imagine it would be painful instead of not 100% comfortable.

I actually only spent $360 on these so it's not like I spent $700+ luckily.


It mostly feels like too much volume on top of the shoe on the Inverness. My toe ends at the medallion swirl at the harrogate,
Looks like the 888 last isn't for you. Both sizes appear to have too much volume. Seems like you need something with a smaller instep and larger toe box
 

stook1

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jul 2, 2015
Messages
3,083
Reaction score
8,081
I very much appreciate the help as I can't get to Leffot easily and there's no NJ stores that carry them to try on.

I reworled the lacing on the inverness and took photis of the toe markings from trying them on.

I just tried the Harogates on again with thicker socks. Like, they're fitted but not too tight. Like ny left toe is grazing the toe box alittle but isn't tight or painful. My toes feel like they can't relax 100%, moreso at 90, so maybe it's a vertical issue. If the toebox was too small I'd imagine it would be painful instead of not 100% comfortable.

I actually only spent $360 on these so it's not like I spent $700+ luckily.


It mostly feels like too much volume on top of the shoe on the Inverness. My toe ends at the medallion swirl at the harrogate,
I think @jischwar is giving you the correct advice.
 

CWL317

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2020
Messages
156
Reaction score
224
I might try 82 next time. I have 202
I'm afraid I only have one pair of Edward Greens, so I can't compare them that much. As embarrassing as that is, when I went to get fitted before I purchased, they were like: oh, 82, that's what you want - your feet are just too wide for the other lasts.

So in that sense, I find them very comfortable!
Thanks - interesting to know. I have E-202 and it seems a bit tight in the toe box. I am waiting on a pair of F-202 which might suit my feet better, but if 82 is more accommodating then I think I’ll go for that next time.
 

JFWR

Distinguished Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2020
Messages
1,878
Reaction score
2,727
I might try 82 next time. I have 202

Thanks - interesting to know. I have E-202 and it seems a bit tight in the toe box. I am waiting on a pair of F-202 which might suit my feet better, but if 82 is more accommodating then I think I’ll go for that next time.
The width of my feet is focused in the toe box. I have in some sense V shaped feet - my feet are widest at the toes, much narrower at the heels. My width requirement is near the toes as the most essential for me to feel I have a comfortable fit, as I do not like my toes cramped. As such, the 82 last twas recommended as it offered me that, and indeed, I felt no discomfort.

Amusingly, my shoes felt more cramped than the-in-store shoe when I purchased them and had to get them slightly stretched, which worked fine as EG's calfskin is beautiful and easy to stretch.
 

Nickd

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 13, 2016
Messages
847
Reaction score
1,033
I might try 82 next time. I have 202

Thanks - interesting to know. I have E-202 and it seems a bit tight in the toe box. I am waiting on a pair of F-202 which might suit my feet better, but if 82 is more accommodating then I think I’ll go for that next time.
82 is less accommodating in the toe box than 202.

The F width may be the solution - when going up a width fitting in EG you will gain at least as much width as you would going up a half size.
 

CWL317

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2020
Messages
156
Reaction score
224
The width of my feet is focused in the toe box. I have in some sense V shaped feet - my feet are widest at the toes, much narrower at the heels. My width requirement is near the toes as the most essential for me to feel I have a comfortable fit, as I do not like my toes cramped. As such, the 82 last twas recommended as it offered me that, and indeed, I felt no discomfort.

Amusingly, my shoes felt more cramped than the-in-store shoe when I purchased them and had to get them slightly stretched, which worked fine as EG's calfskin is beautiful and easy to stretch.
Same with me - the factory freshly made shoe is tighter than the in-store display shoe that I tried on in the same last and size. Is it because of the new leather being stiff and tight and they are compensating for natural stretch through normal wear, I wonder.
 

JustPullHarder

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2020
Messages
279
Reaction score
568
Same with me - the factory freshly made shoe is tighter than the in-store display shoe that I tried on in the same last and size. Is it because of the new leather being stiff and tight and they are compensating for natural stretch through normal wear, I wonder.
Highly doubt that they are making special shoes that are marginally larger just for in store.

Could have been that several customers have put their feet in. Also could have been the time of day and amount you walked before trying on the shoes.

There's also probably a little bit in terms of what leather they use and variance when they are lasting it.
 

Nickd

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 13, 2016
Messages
847
Reaction score
1,033
It’s almost certainly differences in materials and make. I’ve got several pairs on 202 and several pairs on 82 and they all fit very subtly differently. Even 2 pairs of the same model on the same last don’t fit exactly the same.
 

Thomas_M

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2019
Messages
167
Reaction score
245
R2 tapered rubber sole. The absolute best sole EG offers!
I have this sole on my Dovers and it's amazing indeed.
But don't you think you lose a bit of flexibility, breathability and suppleness compared to a leather sole?
For a boot or if it rains a lot, the tradeoff is obvious but for a summer or dress shoes, I think I still prefer a leather sole, don't you?
 

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by

Featured Sponsor

Styleforum x S.E.H Kelly Balmacaan: Choose the Fabric

  • standard 5 — light and dark brown

    Votes: 1 2.6%
  • standard 7 — dark brown and charcoal

    Votes: 7 18.4%
  • wide 1 — charcoal and blue-grey

    Votes: 1 2.6%
  • wide 3 — barley and brown

    Votes: 4 10.5%
  • wide 5 — charcoal and dark navy

    Votes: 3 7.9%
  • wide 6 — charcoal and black

    Votes: 1 2.6%
  • wide 7 — dark green and black

    Votes: 8 21.1%
  • wide 8 — malt and dark brown

    Votes: 3 7.9%
  • wide 9 — blue-grey and charcoal

    Votes: 10 26.3%

Related Threads

Forum statistics

Threads
457,451
Messages
9,917,178
Members
206,711
Latest member
Terryman
Top