• Hi, I am the owner and main administrator of Styleforum. If you find the forum useful and fun, please help support it by buying through the posted links on the forum. Our main, very popular sales thread, where the latest and best sales are listed, are posted HERE

    Purchases made through some of our links earns a commission for the forum and allows us to do the work of maintaining and improving it. Finally, thanks for being a part of this community. We realize that there are many choices today on the internet, and we have all of you to thank for making Styleforum the foremost destination for discussions of menswear.
  • This site contains affiliate links for which Styleforum may be compensated.
  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

    Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

Design philosophy

Renwick

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
172
Reaction score
1
I found a really great definition of deconstructionism in fashion ------- Addressing a genre, a tradition, but so as to expand it, blow it open, spread it out, open its borders to its own hidden selves. A question which will not go away and produces -- not answers -- but new possibilities. Not destructive; rather, the deconstructive reveals the obscured. In a sense, then, the deconstructive is creative, productive. http://www.artandculture.com/cgi-bin....O&id=27
 

European Interloper

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2002
Messages
104
Reaction score
0
Gucci has been under fire from the fashion world because it epitomises the Super Brand. Its commercial success has been translated into pure commercialism, which gives Tom Ford no merit for his work. As someone (la?) said, he has found what is at the heart of Gucci and created an image. And unlike what seems to be everyone on this board, I like the new Gucci image. In three seasons, I have found little that I didn't like, and I found some of the ideas expressed on the Gucci catwalk extremely interesting. GQ UK had a poll on all the new catwalk collections. People were asked to vote wether an outfit was more 'catwalk' or more 'everyday'. Gucci was the only house where everything was considered wearable enough to be 'everyday', but still had enough of an 'art' touch to have a considerable 'catwalk' vote. This, for me, explains the feelings that fashion world has towards Gucci. It seems commerical, like Gap or Zara, because it makes things that are wearable in everyday life. It doesn't have a collection that is punctuated with pieces that could only ever belong on the catwalk, which is the case in most brands. However, the poll also said something else: Gucci isn't only wearable, like the aforementioned highstreet brands, but it has a 'fashion' edge to it, an arty touch. This is why I like Gucci, and Tom Ford, so much, a praise their entwined acheivements. The same tactics were employed at YSL, and I find their new collections resolutley desirable.

As for the classification of DG and Versace... Hedonistic really seems to work. It mixes camp with a va va voom sexual energy in every piece it makes, which, like Cavalli's lines, achieve the effect of hedonism.

--European Interloper
 

Featured Sponsor

How important is full vs half canvas to you for heavier sport jackets?

  • Definitely full canvas only

    Votes: 92 37.2%
  • Half canvas is fine

    Votes: 90 36.4%
  • Really don't care

    Votes: 27 10.9%
  • Depends on fabric

    Votes: 42 17.0%
  • Depends on price

    Votes: 38 15.4%

Forum statistics

Threads
506,996
Messages
10,593,255
Members
224,353
Latest member
fgahkvay
Top