- Joined
- Jul 13, 2012
- Messages
- 20,209
- Reaction score
- 33,407
The last lookbook set in Ireland was terrible. A bunch of mis-matched gear from a Wes Anderson improv session..Drake's makes a mean lookbook.
STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
The last lookbook set in Ireland was terrible. A bunch of mis-matched gear from a Wes Anderson improv session..Drake's makes a mean lookbook.
I agree. Seems like, rather than carve out a clothing niche using the strengths you mentioned, they are bludgeoning their way to establish one. Whenever I hit on something I like it's much more expensive than I think it's worth. I'm still amazed they asked $900 for a shirt jacket. I was not surprised when, come sale time, most of the cotton suiting was still available in most sizes.I appreciate that people are frustrated by all of the complaining about Drake's pricing strategy.
Here is my take. Ties, which put Drake's on the map, are excellent quality at a reasonable (but high) price point. There is a nice story of their history, how they are made, and they even more custom options. This drove their success. Their ties, and later scarves and pocket squares, were carried at menswear stores. I have lived in both USA and UK, and years ago (before the store in NY and the Drake's website), it was really great when you could find Drake's ties at places like Barney's or occasionally at Bloomingdale's. I realize not everyone wants these ties and that there are other options available, but generally one would have to acknowledge their ties are a great success.
Most of the new apparel and footwear options lack this origin story. Often they lack any uniqueness too. I'm sure many in this thread remember how Drake's basically re-badged some rugby shirts at a substantially increased price. I'm sure this group really likes Drake's offerings generally - why else would you be reading this - but the premium price charged by Drake's for these ideas is not the same value proposition as their strength - tie's. This lack of equivalency across the brand is the the heart of it for me.
Linen trousers for $555 USD? A cotton vest for $695? OTR shirts for $285? This just isn't the equivalent value of getting Drake's ties. The customer is being asked for a higher premium for something that isn't core to Drake's value proposition / origin story / historical strength. I think this is the source of most of the frustrations on this thread.
Personally, I would like to see Drake's re-position themselves back into what they were historically good at. From there, I would like to see them selectively add product offerings that they can control directly instead of contracting these out each season and tacking on a substantial mark-up.
I agree. Seems like, rather than carve out a clothing niche using the strengths you mentioned, they are bludgeoning their way to establish one. Whenever I hit on something I like it's much more expensive than I think it's worth. I'm still amazed they asked $900 for a shirt jacket. I was not surprised when, come sale time, most of the cotton suiting was still available in most sizes.
The look they are selling is not worth the price they are asking.
Man, you're fast! Work must be dull for you as well today.I thought you unsubscribed from this thread?
Man, you're fast! Work must be dull for you as well today.
I asked a question about the linen long sleeves tees up above. Anyway, thought I'd come back as the Spring/Summer stuff is beginning to arrive. I see many things to like but, like a few others here apparently, I'm balking at the prices.
Do you think Drake's is pushing the Preppy and workwear thing to clearly distance itself from The Armoury? Same owners, right?
I appreciate that people are frustrated by all of the complaining about Drake's pricing strategy.
Here is my take. Ties, which put Drake's on the map, are excellent quality at a reasonable (but high) price point. There is a nice story of their history, how they are made, and they even more custom options. This drove their success. Their ties, and later scarves and pocket squares, were carried at menswear stores. I have lived in both USA and UK, and years ago (before the store in NY and the Drake's website), it was really great when you could find Drake's ties at places like Barney's or occasionally at Bloomingdale's. I realize not everyone wants these ties and that there are other options available, but generally one would have to acknowledge their ties are a great success.
Most of the new apparel and footwear options lack this origin story. Often they lack any uniqueness too. I'm sure many in this thread remember how Drake's basically re-badged some rugby shirts at a substantially increased price. I'm sure this group really likes Drake's offerings generally - why else would you be reading this - but the premium price charged by Drake's for these ideas is not the same value proposition as their strength - tie's. This lack of equivalency across the brand is the the heart of it for me.
Linen trousers for $555 USD? A cotton vest for $695? OTR shirts for $285? This just isn't the equivalent value of getting Drake's ties. The customer is being asked for a higher premium for something that isn't core to Drake's value proposition / origin story / historical strength. I think this is the source of most of the frustrations on this thread.
Personally, I would like to see Drake's re-position themselves back into what they were historically good at. From there, I would like to see them selectively add product offerings that they can control directly instead of contracting these out each season and tacking on a substantial mark-up.
Fair enough, maybe. I do tend to be dismissive like Graham Chapman's Colonel barging in to say "stop that, that's silly!" I try to make honest critical remarks and can tell by other posters that I'm usually not alone. Calling out perceived BS is an old habit even if it makes me seem a bit binary.No, I think Drake's has generally been a more playful take on English, Italian, and American style. That's been their whole pitch ever since they started making for their own label.
Anyway, I'm genuinely bummed that every time someone posts anything outside of your very narrow interest in men's clothing, you feel the need to **** on it. It can be techwear, something fun in classic clothing, or something that you personally wouldn't wear. It feels like if it's not some expensive version of what you can find at Lardini, you don't like it. Which is fine -- lots of people have a narrow interest in clothes. But few feel such a need to be a grumpy dude online and say "that's silly" every time something is not a topcoat and grey flannel trousers.
Yeah, I suppose you’re right. It is like a broken record in many ways. Thanks.I will say that the constant negativity in this thread from a few members gets tiresome. The pricing shouldn't be a surprise to anyone at this point
Sounds like you’re stuck in 2007I wouldn't mind an honest analysis of where you think Drake's is and where it's going.
Okay, more rapid-fire editing. I'm here because I've bought Drake's since 2007 and generally like them. I don't mind being hard on them as it's my money we're talking about in the end.