STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
we should do a deconstruction circle jerk!! (I'm so bored at work)
thewho I don't appreciate how you're using your white, masculine gaze to force us to read your 'texts,' as if your own ability to identify 'meaningful' work was anything other than the product of your privileged, racist upbringing.
i hate modern literary theory. its why im getting an MA in history not english. and because of that i think that most postmodernism is wankery and that hemimgway's misogyny is meaningless (product of his times and all that). it's easy to point fingers at people who lived 50 to 500 yaers ago and declare them deficient when measured against our current morality, but who cares? it doesn't mean anything. it's just a way to make yourself feel better at the expense of someone who isn't alive.
thewho I don't appreciate how you're using your white, masculine gaze to force us to read your 'texts,' as if your own ability to identify 'meaningful' work was anything other than the product of your privileged, racist upbringing.
but i think there's basically two 'big' problems with it:
postmodernism relies on an extremely rigorous and difficult vocabulary, that, i believe, is used to exclude the non-'educated' from the conversation. it smacks of academic elitism, and, as to me the fundamental purpose of any academic writing is to educate and inform, it fails in that regard.
also i think (as the sokal joke shows) that the endless jargon and terminology obscures meaning and acts an excuse for uninformed thought.
huh? lots of academic works don't advocate for political change, and lots of works that are about politics don't try to extend their thesis/conclusions to speak to modern society. not every work needs to end with a 40 page rant about israeli-palestinian relationships :foo:
I'm telling you guys, if you want a solid, unpretentious, oftentimes amusing account of 20th century Western literary theory, then check this out:
http://www.amazon.com/Literary-Theo...4476/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1337012732&sr=8-1
i can cite specific works if you like. i guess what im saying is that i think postmodernism is a useful tool to be used with other tools, but you shouldn't throw everything else out the window. also i really, REALLY strongly feel that any historial work needs to be founded on good, rigorous primary source research. lots of citations and lots of bibliography entries.