• We would like to welcome Ratio Clothing as an official Affiliate Vendor. Ratio Clothing specializes in American-made custom shirts offered at a fair price with guaranteed perfect fit. Please visit their new thread and give them a warm welcome.

  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

Site Topics - Part II

j

(stands for Jerk)
Admin
Joined
Feb 17, 2002
Messages
14,914
Reaction score
95
Part I was getting too big and choking server. Continued. Original thread is here. This is not a thread to call out members, to say "well if he got banned why didn't X,", etc. Concerns about members or threads should be expressed in private message to me or to another appropriate moderator (for the subforum in question). Thanks.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

j

(stands for Jerk)
Admin
Joined
Feb 17, 2002
Messages
14,914
Reaction score
95
Part of the blame for the recent lag goes to humongous threads, some with over 10,000 replies, which also tend to be ones that draw a disproportionate share of traffic. Therefore, I have cut some of the larger threads off into Part II/III etc. and will continue to do so. Normally I would move the last few pages into the new one, but on this one I didn't see much point.
 

CunningSmeagol

Distinguished Member
Joined
Oct 15, 2006
Messages
3,934
Reaction score
17
Why do long threads choke the server draw disproportionate traffic, while the smaller bits of the same thread don't?
 

j

(stands for Jerk)
Admin
Joined
Feb 17, 2002
Messages
14,914
Reaction score
95
Originally Posted by CunningSmeagol
Why do long threads choke the server draw disproportionate traffic, while the smaller bits don't?
According to the guy I talked to who seemed to know his stuff, vBulletin and/or MySQL don't handle the huge threads very well, especially when there are concurrent requests for them (i.e. a ton of people trying to read/post on a thread with 10,000 replies). Some forums actually employ a hack that automatically splits a thread after X replies - after the coming upgrades/optimization, we will see if we need to do something like that. Edit: you changed your question in the middle of me answering. I don't think the short new threads will draw less traffic than the long ones did, but they are shorter, and hence the server is more capable of dealing with it. Think of it as if you had a huge book with 10000 pages and had 1000 people running up asking you to tear out page number X. If your book was 1000 pages instead, it would obviously take you less time to find their page and give it to them.
 

BDC2823

Distinguished Member
Joined
Aug 18, 2007
Messages
4,475
Reaction score
44
Sounds like a smart plan J. Hopefully it helps out with the timed out issues that occur.
 

HORNS

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Apr 24, 2008
Messages
15,805
Reaction score
3,672
In on page #1!!!


Seriously, though, you guys are amazing. Thanks for all your work.
 

Douglas

Stupid ass member
Joined
Aug 17, 2007
Messages
14,658
Reaction score
2,297
As always, j, and all the mods, thanks for all your hard work. Now might be a good time to publish (again) the e-mail address we can Paypal to get special member statu - I mean, to help support the forum.
 

CunningSmeagol

Distinguished Member
Joined
Oct 15, 2006
Messages
3,934
Reaction score
17
Originally Posted by j
According to the guy I talked to who seemed to know his stuff, vBulletin and/or MySQL don't handle the huge threads very well, especially when there are concurrent requests for them (i.e. a ton of people trying to read/post on a thread with 10,000 replies). Some forums actually employ a hack that automatically splits a thread after X replies - after the coming upgrades/optimization, we will see if we need to do something like that.

Severe lag on a forum like this, and the gaggle of professionals and people who otherwise should be working calling itself membership, is probably a good thing.
 

Xiaogou

Distinguished Member
Joined
Sep 2, 2008
Messages
3,796
Reaction score
53
Originally Posted by BDC2823
Sounds like a smart plan J. Hopefully it helps out with the timed out issues that occur.

 

j

(stands for Jerk)
Admin
Joined
Feb 17, 2002
Messages
14,914
Reaction score
95
Originally Posted by CunningSmeagol
Severe lag on a forum like this, and the gaggle of professionals and people who otherwise should be working calling itself membership, is probably a good thing.
The hard thing is that every time we 'fix' or upgrade the server so there is little lag for a few days in a row, we get a huge spike in traffic that doesn't go away, thus putting more load on it at all times thereafter, and increasing the chance of another problem or just overloading it. So this next upgrade, we are going to focus on way overdoing it to future-proof. I'll be very interested to see how our traffic numbers look when the server can put up with anything that can be thrown at it. Based on the current trend, it could get ridiculous, but I'm sure there will be an equilibrium point - we just haven't found it yet.
 

j

(stands for Jerk)
Admin
Joined
Feb 17, 2002
Messages
14,914
Reaction score
95
Originally Posted by Douglas
As always, j, and all the mods, thanks for all your hard work. Now might be a good time to publish (again) the e-mail address we can Paypal to get special member statu - I mean, to help support the forum.

As always, contributions to the cause (server upgrades, hosting fees, my eventual liver transplant) can be made to [email protected] (for normal paypal balances) or [email protected] for anything more complicated (it takes more fees, is all). Thanks for thinking of us.
 

voxsartoria

Goon member
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
25,756
Reaction score
153
Originally Posted by j
Part of the blame for the recent lag goes to humongous threads, some with over 10,000 replies, which also tend to be ones that draw a disproportionate share of traffic. Therefore, I have cut some of the larger threads off into Part II/III etc. and will continue to do so. Normally I would move the last few pages into the new one, but on this one I didn't see much point.

I thought that such threads were too big to fail.


- B
 

kwilkinson

Having a Ball
Joined
Nov 21, 2007
Messages
33,652
Reaction score
862
10 minutes in and this thread is already almost a full page. Probably won't be long until part 3 is needed.
 

DNW

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Mar 10, 2006
Messages
10,527
Reaction score
5
Originally Posted by HORNS
In on page #1!!!


Seriously, though, you guys are amazing. Thanks for all your work.


Originally Posted by oneeightyseven
inb4pg2

You idiots, you forgot about 657 other pages here.
 

Featured Sponsor

HOW OFTEN DO YOU SHOP FOR CLOTHES ONLINE?

  • I mainly buy my clothes online.

  • I shop online only if there is a sale.

  • I shop online when shipping and returns are free.

  • I shop in store only for very expensive items I want to try on.

  • I mainly shop in store.


Results are only viewable after voting.

Related Threads

Forum statistics

Threads
424,252
Messages
9,095,062
Members
191,348
Latest member
BDowns_m8r

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by

Top