archetypal_yuppie
Distinguished Member
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2010
- Messages
- 2,855
- Reaction score
- 591
Anything that you can feel as fat on a mat would be an egriousiously fat shot on the course - one of those that goes only 20 yards total, vs. of one of those that goes 145 instead of 155.
The danger zone is shots that don't feel fat on a mat, but would be such on the course. Mats can be very misleading because even the 20-yarder will go 130 off of the mat.
Bear in mind that on grass, the ball tends to be much more sunken into the grass/ground vs. on a mat, where it sits nicely on top. Thus on grass the margin of error between thin and fat is meaningfully smaller.
All I have access to are mats. It's pretty easy to tell when you're striking the ball flush vs hitting it fat, even on a mat. The results are more similar than they would be off grass, but you can still feel the mis-hit.
Anything that you can feel as fat on a mat would be an egriousiously fat shot on the course - one of those that goes only 20 yards total, vs. of one of those that goes 145 instead of 155.
The danger zone is shots that don't feel fat on a mat, but would be such on the course. Mats can be very misleading because even the 20-yarder will go 130 off of the mat.
Bear in mind that on grass, the ball tends to be much more sunken into the grass/ground vs. on a mat, where it sits nicely on top. Thus on grass the margin of error between thin and fat is meaningfully smaller.