• Hi, I am the owner and main administrator of Styleforum. If you find the forum useful and fun, please help support it by buying through the posted links on the forum. Our main, very popular sales thread, where the latest and best sales are listed, are posted HERE

    Purchases made through some of our links earns a commission for the forum and allows us to do the work of maintaining and improving it. Finally, thanks for being a part of this community. We realize that there are many choices today on the internet, and we have all of you to thank for making Styleforum the foremost destination for discussions of menswear.
  • This site contains affiliate links for which Styleforum may be compensated.
  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

    Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

The Ultimate "HARDCORE" Shoe Appreciation Thread (Bespoke only)

fritzl

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Apr 19, 2006
Messages
12,266
Reaction score
268
Originally Posted by ThinkDerm
orig.jpg


is this scatpron?
 

gazman70k

Distinguished Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2008
Messages
1,144
Reaction score
747
Originally Posted by cdmoore1855
Why are there holes in the back of the shoes ?

Tony Gaziano explains:

The pin holes at the back are for lasting reasons. If we don't secure the backs when we last the front of the shoes, they will slide down, giving a low back height.

The pins are normally nailed through the stitching line so that they are camouflaged, but in this case there is no stitching.

I am exploring a different way of doing it, so as to hide them.


He also noted that upon completion, the hole is sealed and concealed. How this is achieved, I don't know.

Gaz
 

cdmoore1855

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2008
Messages
510
Reaction score
9
Originally Posted by gazman70k

Tony Gaziano explains:

The pin holes at the back are for lasting reasons. If we don't secure the backs when we last the front of the shoes, they will slide down, giving a low back height.

The pins are normally nailed through the stitching line so that they are camouflaged, but in this case there is no stitching.

I am exploring a different way of doing it, so as to hide them.


He also noted that upon completion, the hole is sealed and concealed. How this is achieved, I don't know.

Gaz


Interesting, so I wonder how my seamless wholecuts were lasted. There is no evidence of holes in the back unless they are expertly concealed by shrinking the leather. I am guessing this must be right cos the only way to do the seamless show is by shrinking the heel
 

shoefan

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2003
Messages
853
Reaction score
203
It is also possible to leave some lining leather untrimmed above the top of the quarters and to put the nail through that -- normally, the lining is made a bit larger than the upper and then trimmed after the two are sewed together. Then, after the shoe is finished, you trim the lining leather.
 

DWFII

Bespoke Boot and Shoemaker
Dubiously Honored
Joined
Jan 8, 2008
Messages
10,132
Reaction score
5,714
It is also possible, in my experience, to last a shoe without any tacks/pins in the upper and without leaving excess lining to tack into. The possible exception might be a loafer/slip-on shoe...in which case the excess lining technique is to be preferred, IMO.

That said, the pinning technique is an old one...used, I suspect, more often when the shoe is "dead lasted" rather than lasted "seats up."

In the latter approach, the frontpart of the shoe is lasted first with the heel of the last a centimeter or so offset from where it will eventually end up. Then the backpart of the shoe is "hoisted" into position. Doing it this way, there is enough tension along the topline that slippage is not a factor.
 

Fishball

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2007
Messages
1,878
Reaction score
217
Originally Posted by shoefan
It is also possible to leave some lining leather untrimmed above the top of the quarters and to put the nail through that -- normally, the lining is made a bit larger than the upper and then trimmed after the two are sewed together. Then, after the shoe is finished, you trim the lining leather.

It is how I was taught.
 

luk-cha

Distinguished Member
Dubiously Honored
Joined
Jun 1, 2006
Messages
4,530
Reaction score
83
Originally Posted by shoefan
It is also possible to leave some lining leather untrimmed above the top of the quarters and to put the nail through that -- normally, the lining is made a bit larger than the upper and then trimmed after the two are sewed together. Then, after the shoe is finished, you trim the lining leather.

Originally Posted by DWFII
It is also possible, in my experience, to last a shoe without any tacks/pins in the upper and without leaving excess lining to tack into. The possible exception might be a loafer/slip-on shoe...in which case the excess lining technique is to be preferred, IMO.

That said, the pinning technique is an old one...used, I suspect, more often when the shoe is "dead lasted" rather than lasted "seats up."

In the latter approach, the frontpart of the shoe is lasted first with the heel of the last a centimeter or so offset from where it will eventually end up. Then the backpart of the shoe is "hoisted" into position. Doing it this way, there is enough tension along the topline that slippage is not a factor.




please dont forget that this shoe is seamless, normally i am sure both of you are right but when dealing with this kind of shoes where is it seamless i would think that it is slightly different to the norm
 

DWFII

Bespoke Boot and Shoemaker
Dubiously Honored
Joined
Jan 8, 2008
Messages
10,132
Reaction score
5,714
Originally Posted by luk-cha
please dont forget that this shoe is seamless, normally i am sure both of you are right but when dealing with this kind of shoes where is it seamless i would think that it is slightly different to the norm
I'm not so sure. I don't have any quarrel or problem with "pinning" the heel. There are several "schools" of thought and procedure relevant here and I'm not prepared to say one is better than the other. I, personally, would prefer not to make holes in a shoe that are not functional to the design and structure but, as I said, pinning has some tradition behind it. That said, the fact that the shoe is seamless shouldn't make any difference as to whether the patterns are right; whether the shoe is "hoisted" during lasting; or, ultimately, whether a pin would be needed. In other words, the seamlessness should be beside the point. I can see from the photos that the extra lining technique wouldn't be feasible in the case of this particular method of construction, however.
 

Fishball

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2007
Messages
1,878
Reaction score
217
Originally Posted by DWFII
I can see from the photos that the extra lining technique wouldn't be feasible in the case of this particular method of construction, however.

Ah, I see. The lining and upper are "folded" together so that no seam will be shown, so there are no "extra lining" you can pinned, right, DW?

I think it is ok to not pinned it at all, it just make lasting little bit diffcult, but still do-able, at lease I have seen "shi-fu" do it.

BTW, here is my "new", "bespoke" last! Actually a duplicate of my old bespoke last:

P1050146.jpg


Made on 17 Sept, 2010
 

Fishball

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2007
Messages
1,878
Reaction score
217
My first trial shoe for my beloved wife:

P1050144.jpg


Will finished it with a bow, the style after Ferragamo
 

DWFII

Bespoke Boot and Shoemaker
Dubiously Honored
Joined
Jan 8, 2008
Messages
10,132
Reaction score
5,714
Originally Posted by gazman70k
Work in progress TEASER. The seamless single stitch whole cut.
orig.jpg
Fishball, You've got it right...but pinning can be done in that extra lining margin or, as in the photo above, it can be done right through the counter/heel stiffener. It's this last technique that I personally would prefer to avoid if possible although as I say it has a well accepted/respected past. PS...that's a nice looking pump/court shoe. How high is the heel and how are you going to construct the heel? (Hope you'll post it on the CC)
 

Fishball

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2007
Messages
1,878
Reaction score
217
Originally Posted by DWFII
Fishball,

You've got it right...but pinning can be done in that extra lining margin or, as in the photo above, it can be done right through the counter/heel stiffener.

It's this last technique that I personally would prefer to avoid if possible although as I say it has a well accepted/respected past.

PS...that's a nice looking pump/court shoe. How high is the heel and how are you going to construct the heel? (Hope you'll post it on the CC)


DW,

~1". I am thinking of built it up by leather, or a premade heel block, any other suggestion?
 

bigbris1

Distinguished Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2007
Messages
6,964
Reaction score
15
Originally Posted by gazman70k
Gaziano & Girling Tokyo Trunk Show Summer 2010


gaz, there was something eerily familiar as I scrolled thru the pics you posted, from the way the shoes were laid out, some of the designs, right down to the pic of Tony kneeling on the carpet trained on the customer's feet. Then it hit me! My visit with Chay Cooper.

For those looking to go custom Alfred Sargent offers what I think is a great product with excellent service to boot. And so this isn't for nothing, my dream realized:




 

Featured Sponsor

How important is full vs half canvas to you for heavier sport jackets?

  • Definitely full canvas only

    Votes: 92 37.6%
  • Half canvas is fine

    Votes: 90 36.7%
  • Really don't care

    Votes: 26 10.6%
  • Depends on fabric

    Votes: 41 16.7%
  • Depends on price

    Votes: 38 15.5%

Forum statistics

Threads
506,947
Messages
10,593,080
Members
224,354
Latest member
jamesirichard90
Top