comrade
Distinguished Member
- Joined
- May 10, 2005
- Messages
- 9,016
- Reaction score
- 2,309
thanks for the responses, much appreciated. in general, do you all think i'm making too big a deal of going for a wide fitting? i used to just choose the model of shoe i liked stylistically, and then sized up 1 full size to get the extra width, but i'm worried if i do this with a relatively expensive shoe i'll just ruin the shoe long term. thoughts??
i went around london saturday, my thoughts:
c&j: agree MTO prices would push me to EG (have to double c&j price to choose shoe MTO in "g" last) only "non-agricultural" shoes were the draycott and bedford in a "g". bedford (£295) looks OK, what are everyones thoughts on the bedford? Journeyman - c&j used to do a hallem "g" (they had a few sizes left in london) but its been disconinued. actually the trend i discovered at most shops (except barkers) is that all the manufacters are carrying less and less wide fitting shoes (especially in non-branded shops). barker theexception, they seem to have a little niche in wide fitting shoes.
EG: i tried chelsea on in a "g" (£600). was a bit tight, but its a gorgeous shoe and does'nt look too wide as some do. For me, the value in EG is getting MTO (which some of you mentioned) as you just add roughly £100 to the any model and they can do it in a "g" fitting. i am considering the EG chelsea in black or dark brown (love the lighter brown but would have to get it MTO)
JM Weston: they also do a wide fitting. the best fit (most comfortable/widest) was the savile 582 "g" (£495). not to everyones taste, but Kraftar if you are after a whole cut (has some punching detail) it was the widest/most comfortable "g" fit besides barkers for width (but they look WIDE)
Barkers: wide fits, although the shoes looked massive. but for an everyday work shoe, barkers may be the way to go (c&j nicer but price differential vast).
Churches: do any of their shoes in a "g" MTO, cant remember percentage over they charge but no where near as much as c&j MTO mark up. for £300 i would prefer c&j. consul, diplomat, chetwynd all built on the same last and all felt wide enough
Ferragamo: they also do an EEE fitting, but staff were not very helpful (they did not know which shoes were available in a wide fitting). also some of the pricing was pushing £500, so i thought EG would be better
Grenson: do Archie brogue (which i think is quite nice) in a "g" - have not tried it on yet.
Loake: i could not find London stock, but on herringshoes i may get try the loaeke kew as it looks nice (worried will look as wide as Barkers though)
so i felt for special occasion shoes EG MTO offer the best quality/style/price...(c&j too high MTO, JM weston wholecut fit great but selection of shoes that fit not great and price (£495 for JM's versus £600 for EGs) too close to EG which i felt were better shoes).
a few more questions, if i may..
- work shoes (my budget £160 - £200 ish) - any recommendations much appreciated in a wide fitting
- besides EG chelsea, any other recommendations that fit wide? 202 mentioned, is that chelsea?
- what are people thoughts on prada loafers (or any recommendations on widish fitting loafers)
-finally - does anyone know if EG can do a slightly larger "g'. sadly the "g" was still a bit snug, and i even took your advice and went from a 7 to 7.5. i think 8 would just ruin the shoe long term but i'm not sure as EG staff were not very helpful.
sorry for all the questions, i have searched for forums on wide fitting shoes but i dont think they're many of us with wide feet out there !!
I share your affliction. I wear 4E ( US) running shoes ( trainers) This is about an H width.
I can suggest Ludwig Reiter Amerikaner or Uniform last. I have two pairs of derbies on the
Amerikaner last. They fit in the width and do not look very "klunky"
ludwig-reiter.com