ragcondesk
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2007
- Messages
- 53
- Reaction score
- 0
A few months back I attended a party for MIA students (Maryland Institute of Art) and the talk came around to clothing. Most of the guys checked out but several female students and models were seemingly fascinated when I told them about SF’s aversion to store distressed denim and/or graphic t’s. I wound up taking a group of interested folks to the back room and proceeded to show them SF and the various put downs and hatred directed towards such. For some reason this elicited so much laughter and hostility that I was surprised.
I must weigh in that I think the elitist view that there is one ‘correct’ style is silly. I have worn dark blue untouched denim for the last 20 years as well as super distressed and do not discount any one style. After all, it does get down to the micro as to clothing worn to the point of looking distressed VS a (well done) factory job.
For the next 3 or 4 hours the girls took relish in showing me every ‘hot’ movie star, celebrity, rock star etc… that recently wore distressed jeans. In fact, aside from a few obscure bands and the SF selvedge crew I admit I had a very hard time finding dark, untouched denim on ‘hunks’.
There was a ton of 9’s and 10’s at the party who unanimously agreed that they liked guys in the distressed look. Some of the comments about the plain t/ clean jean look went from ugly to downright insulting. Only one girl said she preferred the ‘clean’ look and hated anything distressed and she was (only reporting truth) both overweight and unattractively dressed.
At the end of the day I wear what I like and could care less what anyone thinks but It did leave me thinking that I used to dress for the feminine sex.
Did I mention I was wearing plain linen Varvatos T, sd xxx-28’s and Visvim Kiefers? I am guessing they were all snickering behind my back as it was the sa’s that brought up the whole damn conversation in the first place….
I must weigh in that I think the elitist view that there is one ‘correct’ style is silly. I have worn dark blue untouched denim for the last 20 years as well as super distressed and do not discount any one style. After all, it does get down to the micro as to clothing worn to the point of looking distressed VS a (well done) factory job.
For the next 3 or 4 hours the girls took relish in showing me every ‘hot’ movie star, celebrity, rock star etc… that recently wore distressed jeans. In fact, aside from a few obscure bands and the SF selvedge crew I admit I had a very hard time finding dark, untouched denim on ‘hunks’.
There was a ton of 9’s and 10’s at the party who unanimously agreed that they liked guys in the distressed look. Some of the comments about the plain t/ clean jean look went from ugly to downright insulting. Only one girl said she preferred the ‘clean’ look and hated anything distressed and she was (only reporting truth) both overweight and unattractively dressed.
At the end of the day I wear what I like and could care less what anyone thinks but It did leave me thinking that I used to dress for the feminine sex.
Did I mention I was wearing plain linen Varvatos T, sd xxx-28’s and Visvim Kiefers? I am guessing they were all snickering behind my back as it was the sa’s that brought up the whole damn conversation in the first place….