Orgetorix
Distinguished Member
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2007
- Messages
- 3,073
- Reaction score
- 3,990
Agree. No way those are legit. They didn't put that kind of labeling inside back them.
i'm pretty curious about those 501s.
they look completely unworn but i don't see any storage wear either?
i'd think levi's would cough up $100k to get those if they believed them to be legit.
remember that guy who found an enormous nugget on his property in gold country cali, and then tried selling the place for some stupid amount? and then it turned out when they tested the gold it was Australian? lol if it seems to good to be true it often is.
write it down, i'm calling shenanigans on this.
lol yes it sounded exactly like nicole kidman. i guess the impurities or whatever. anyways it turned out to be a pretty elaborate real estate swindle.
but back to the pants: even if they were unworn it looks like they've been lovingly stored for 100+ years?! and yet no deep crusty creases, no loss of indigo (which btw happens in storage, it's a pretty fugitive dye on cotton hence sick fadezzz). the more i smell the sharper the bullshit. oh well.
and the proof is what? the pocket stamp? oh okay, but let's not mention provenance... and why a dealer from maine if they're trying to market it to the pacific rim? lol none of this adds up.
Agree. No way those are legit. They didn't put that kind of labeling inside back them.