Testudo_Aubreii
Senior Member
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2011
- Messages
- 947
- Reaction score
- 309
It's incorrect, or at least inaccurate, in context. He's calling a 6x3 a "six-button" model to distinguish it from the other DBs pictured, most of which also carry six buttons.
To be fair: Pask is describing a 6x3 immediately after describing a 4x2 and calls the former "a higher, six-button model." (Notice that this again confuses button stance and button arrangement.) But the most obvious difference between a 4x2 and a 6x3 is not the total number of buttons, nor the height of the working buttons relative to other coats with the same button arrangment; rather, it's how many buttons fasten. So it's inaccurate to call that 6x3 "a higher, six-button model" than that 4x2. The label doesn't describe the crucial difference. But I take it that Pask does see the crucial difference: so I conclude that he's using the wrong words to describe it.
To be fair: Pask is describing a 6x3 immediately after describing a 4x2 and calls the former "a higher, six-button model." (Notice that this again confuses button stance and button arrangement.) But the most obvious difference between a 4x2 and a 6x3 is not the total number of buttons, nor the height of the working buttons relative to other coats with the same button arrangment; rather, it's how many buttons fasten. So it's inaccurate to call that 6x3 "a higher, six-button model" than that 4x2. The label doesn't describe the crucial difference. But I take it that Pask does see the crucial difference: so I conclude that he's using the wrong words to describe it.
Last edited: