NWTeal
Distinguished Member
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2013
- Messages
- 1,196
- Reaction score
- 201
I know this cat is a regular here, but something about this just seems wrong to me. I feel like whomever commissioned the shoe should have first dibs on purchasing them as seconds. Does anyone else agree?
I think it's the fact that he's reselling them that rubs me the wrong way....
Pepper, I happen to agree with you.
I think if someone commissions a shoe and it gets rejected at AE before it is shipped, the person should be able to get a photo with a description of the flaw and decide if they want to buy it at a discounted price.
Agreed. This might belong on the MTO thread, but I think part of the MTO appeal is having a shoe that's unique to you. It cheapens it a little bit. At the very least I'd prefer it just go to the shoebank than an ebay seller. Don't blame the guy selling them he's just taking advantage, but I agree it's not ideal.
Last edited: