Fuuma
Franchouillard Modasse
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2004
- Messages
- 26,951
- Reaction score
- 14,542
There's a difference between believing that objective improvement is possible and believing that you know, in all certainty, what is objectively better or worse. If you believe objective improvement is possible, you will demand rational explanations for change; if you don't think anything is 'better' or 'worse', except in completely subjective way, you won't require such justification.
You're trying to turn the active into the passive; you weren't born in 1920, hence you purposely chose the fashions of that time as your reference point, if that's what you did. You didn't start at point "0" which is what is "the norm" in your surroundings and reject change as it passed you by as non-productive, contrary to how you usually present that narrative...