Crizzlelovesyou
Distinguished Member
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2020
- Messages
- 3,006
- Reaction score
- 6,265
I agree that the 2014s I had were a bit shorter and lower volume. Honestly I was ignoring the super old 2030s just because they're so rare. I do think its a one-two punch of both pattern and last changes. Also the leather toe puffs contribute to a lot of the front end aesthetic changes as they've been messing around with them too.I don't think this is correct based on my exp. The 2013-2014 stuff fits really quite differently. There's been 3 iterations or so of the 2030 last, and with some pretty diff changes, there's a pic of all three doing the rounds somewhere. The toe is much rounder, heel is different. My experience is the older ones fit shorter, lower volume, lower instep. the 2018 iteration is slightly diff and fits a touch larger. The 2020 + one is again different, rounder toe, bigger instep. The newer 2030 in size 11 is a very different fit from anything older for me, but I have a low instep, my facings were fairly wide on the older last but now touch at the top. This is all pretty clear just looking at the boots from those eras side by side. Aside from that they moved from hand to machine lasting and the tweaks in the last was supposed to accommodate that change. I could prob take TTS brannock on some of the older GYW models.
TLDR oldest quite a bit less roomy, older slightly less roomy, newer biggest.
The pattern changes are all pretty different too, just look at the old height vs the new one! But as you say prob only applicable to nerds.