David Copeland
Senior Member
- Joined
- Apr 6, 2013
- Messages
- 905
- Reaction score
- 76
STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
I did not read anything hateful in her opinion. She appears to be very respectful of others while describing her preferences.I gotta say...that woman seems surprisingly well adjusted given her views.
Nobody would win a lawsuit based on an employer ordering female employees to wear dresses. It is historically gender appropriate.Yeah I can't see a good reason for this other than the boss likes ogling the women. This would never fly in a larger company. I think the employer is opening himself up to a potential lawsuit.
As for the employees feeling better due to the dress code, I assume the women would feel just as good with the option of pant suits or skirts.
I did not read anything hateful in her opinion. She appears to be very respectful of others while describing her preferences.
I think it is because they argued that it was essential for their business. Part of what they sell is scantily clad women serving you beer and wings. I don't think Bank of America could make that same case.If it is illegal to set attire standards then how does Hooters order female employees to wear tiny tight clothing that is sexualized?
Well, sans the implications towards homosexuals, I agree. As I said, surprisingly well adjusted.
I think it is because they argued that it was essential for their business. Part of what they sell is scantily clad women serving you beer and wings. I don't think Bank of America could make that same case.
Wow, where to begin? This article is filled with undercurrents of homophobia and religious and societal oppression. The fact that it is written by a woman doesn't make it better. It just means she has bought into it.
I did not read anything hateful in her opinion. She appears to be very respectful of others while describing her preferences.
I did not read anything hateful in her opinion. She appears to be very respectful of others while describing her preferences.
Really? Describing gay people as disgusting is respectful? You're either a joke, or sad.
I'm assuming he was referring more to the general crux of her argument in the article overall and how she was responding to people who disagreed with her view, not so much her thoughts on things that only were tagentially related despite her effort to spend a sentence tying them in.