How We Used to Dress

Discussion in 'Classic Menswear' started by comrade, Jul 14, 2013.

  1. comrade

    comrade Senior member

    Messages:
    5,968
    Likes Received:
    323
    Joined:
    May 10, 2005
    Location:
    Menlo Park, CA


  2. David Copeland

    David Copeland Senior member

    Messages:
    900
    Likes Received:
    48
    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2013
    Location:
    Originally from Newport Beach - Now living in West
    My boss insists that all men and women dress in business attire every day except Friday (which is casual). The women are required to wear either a dress or skirt (no slacks).

    Funny thing happened as the newcomers got used to it - - - they felt and performed better, and began to look forward to a business attire every day.

    In the meantime, our colleagues at other offices who have gone with the flow of more casual have suffered in too many ways to mention.

    All my best,

    David
    [​IMG]
     


  3. irgendwas

    irgendwas Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    58
    Likes Received:
    8
    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2012
    Location:
    Austria
    If you support traditional business attire, casual fridays can be considered a hypocrisy.
    Additionally, I think the reason why women aren't allowed to wear trousers can only be conservativism with a sexist undertone (distinct from wanting one's staff to look professional). After all, long trousers (if they aren't especially slim) are more modest than a skirt, assuming the skirt isn't ankle-length or longer. While a skirt is more traditional for women's business attire than trousers, I don't understand why women wearing a skirt should look more professional than those wearing trousers.
     


  4. David Copeland

    David Copeland Senior member

    Messages:
    900
    Likes Received:
    48
    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2013
    Location:
    Originally from Newport Beach - Now living in West
    My earlier post reflected what my employer's policy was . . . not mine.

    It also reflected the results of the policy, which proved to be better for both the men and the women who chose to abide by the policy.

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     


  5. msulinski

    msulinski Senior member

    Messages:
    2,139
    Likes Received:
    159
    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2012
    Location:
    NYC
    Quote:Yeah I can't see a good reason for this other than the boss likes ogling the women. This would never fly in a larger company. I think the employer is opening himself up to a potential lawsuit.

    As for the employees feeling better due to the dress code, I assume the women would feel just as good with the option of pant suits or skirts.
     


  6. aravenel

    aravenel Senior member

    Messages:
    5,624
    Likes Received:
    1,171
    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2006
    Location:
    New York City
    Ha, yeah, that is 100% a lawsuit waiting to happen. That guy is a chump.
     


  7. Off My Rack

    Off My Rack Senior member

    Messages:
    163
    Likes Received:
    11
    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2012
    There are actually some federal court judges that have that same policy...
     


  8. archibaldleach

    archibaldleach Senior member

    Messages:
    5,264
    Likes Received:
    2,251
    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2006
    Location:
    Chicago, IL
    

    Historically, pants on women were considered immodest and skirts and dresses considered more modest (though some of this may have due to said sexist undertones). I'm not trying to suggest that the policy is defensible and think it's kind of silly to tell women they can't wear pants, but I'm not so sure that an appropriate length skirt suit or dress is necessarily less modest than an equivalent pant suit or that long trousers are more modest than a skirt.
     


  9. DocHolliday

    DocHolliday Senior member Dubiously Honored

    Messages:
    16,118
    Likes Received:
    1,088
    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2005
    Location:
    Tombstone
    It was a turning point on Mad Men this season when Peggy donned a pant suit.
     


  10. Calder

    Calder Senior member

    Messages:
    165
    Likes Received:
    26
    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2011
    Regarding the article linked by OP, the only thing that photo tells you really is that hats were much more prevalent in 1929. Also, the photo was probably taken in the colder half of the year, what with everyone wearing overcoats.

    While I agree that a well chosen hat and overcoat looks great, most people just don't do hats anymore.

    On the subject of ladieswear, there are some women who look better in skirts, some who look better in trousers, and some who can wear either. The problem here is that most women (like most men) do not know how to dress well, and that concepts of feminism take precedence over actually looking good in some peoples imagination.
     




  11. GBR

    GBR Senior member

    Messages:
    7,789
    Likes Received:
    551
    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2006
    
    You would struggle to enforce a 'no trousers' rule for women in the UK. Likely to be illegal.
     


  12. msulinski

    msulinski Senior member

    Messages:
    2,139
    Likes Received:
    159
    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2012
    Location:
    NYC
    Quote:I suspect you would have difficulty in the US as well. It is easier to get away with in small companies where there is no HR department to complain to. In these situations, people very often just go with the flow so that they don't get fired.
     


  13. VinnyMac

    VinnyMac Senior member

    Messages:
    1,868
    Likes Received:
    139
    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2012
    I smell bullshxt with a hint of trolling...nice narrative though.
     


  14. comrade

    comrade Senior member

    Messages:
    5,968
    Likes Received:
    323
    Joined:
    May 10, 2005
    Location:
    Menlo Park, CA
    

    Yeah. But the range of overcoats are the now classical style swooned over in numerous menswear blogs, including
    Style Forum. No thinsulaite, down or crappy raincoats with zip-in lining in view. They didn't exist yet .
    Most of those coats are in classical styles that are not routinely available at non-bespoke prices except from a few retailers-
    O'Connells come to mind:

    http://www.oconnellsclothing.com/home.php?cat=263
     


Share This Page

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by