JapanAlex01
Distinguished Member
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2011
- Messages
- 2,007
- Reaction score
- 305
I think the collar looks stumpy, the sleeves look too long, and I dislike the tie. Sorry: just my opinion.
STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
I can't dig the shoes but everything else lead the way maestro.
This might be my last post before heading back to the drawing board, I have plans for more trouser with shorter rise and a small leg opening as well as a grey three piece suit.
If anything I post will be SF approved this is it. Featuring grey wool trouser with.... the dreaded slight break:
ok, there's still a lot of improvement for e.g. victor, whom you mentioned in your former statement, doing it well.
besides victor- sorry for picking him out, but he's exemplary for dressing well and not congruent with the wheels(shoes) - there are a few phenomens i monitored on sf, mostly exclusive to muricans, anyway.
-people tend to micromanage their clothes and think their choice of shoes can be let to groupthink.
-muricans are afraid of sizing. actually one size up is three millimeters in length or width. actually this can be all or nothing. get aware of it.
-considering that people have different foot shapes due dilligence is of advantage. this is a learning process. see micromanaging above.
no need to enhance the basic understanding of feet against shoes at this point.
taking victor as role model.
point of departure: small and wide feet.
he favors short and wide lasts. c&j and trickers caters him.
i assume fit is good. no creasing and other visible parameters.
where's the improvement?
imo and from a subjective point of view, the proband is building his wardrobe around his body(shape) with exceedingly carefulness to fit and appearance. on the other hand, the choice of shoes is a mixture of brand slavery and lack of attention, imo.
he walks in his shoes, not me.
he claims to be fussy with proportions, not me.
discuss.
If you hung your jacket somewhere I guess this is OK (too much stripes perhaps?)
I thought of using the word conservative, but it's not actually that specifically which I like/noticed. It's more that within a (fairly) conservative range, you're now picking outfits that add weight (not physically, more like gravitas). It's possible to dress perfectly conservatively and still look light-hearted and jolly. Your look opts for a more "stately" approach, which I think becomes you.
Holdfast, the trousers are light blue. The SC has the same blue running throughout the checks. I think it works/I like it, but I might consider white!
Light blue works perfectly fine IMO (though I think cream would still be more ideal). I thought they might be pale lilac, and that was what I was on the fence about.
Busy - in a good way - day...
This isn't Sir F.
I, along with many other SFers think that you should try and come across a little less blunt when ur trying to describe or insult another males human body figure. Unless of course it's that important to you how other men's body's are built...
JJ, snoogz = sir f
clearly, he is ashamed. he hasnt posted since being called out after the post you quoted.
maybe his next return will be more clandestine.
It's about time someone supplied the exclamation point for those poor boys.
I'm eager to hear what yywwyy thinks about your ass.