Ashley_S
Distinguished Member
- Joined
- May 14, 2019
- Messages
- 1,133
- Reaction score
- 9,466
Thank you both for weighing in. This is really helpful.
Yes, he is extremely flat footed. I could take them to the local Allen Edmonds store and have him try on a few different sizes. Which of their last most closely approximates the vintage Florsheim Kenmoor?
So although a 9D certainly wouldn't have been out of the question, and would have been a size I definitely would have brought out to try, i wonder if he should try an 8.5 E instead. They are sister sizes...think "same house, different floorplan", so they have the same amount of real-estate inside, but that space is moved around and that makes a difference. I'll admit that sometimes when you measure someone it's relatively cut and dry, but with your friend here...there are many variables and it isn't quite so simple. He'll need to play around a bit to find his happy middle ground between his two feet. I'd say see about that 8.5 E, listen to his feedback, and tweak from there. First to admit I know very little about vintage Florsheim so I'm not able to speak on that.
Edit: About the flat footed question- I do not ignore the arch measurement when someone is flat footed, but it's not uncommon to create slipping in the heel when you factor that in for someone who lacks and arch, because it's speaking to an arch that person doesn't have. So I bring that size out, but I know to watch for slipping in those cases. Most of the time I end up following heel to toe length on someone without an arch unless the arch measurement is considerably longer than the toe measurement (which your friend's kind of is, reinforcing the statement I made about many variables and needing to experiment). It's all kind of an art, not a science, in my opinion.
Last edited: