STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
on the internet, everyone has too much meat for their pants
Ever heard of the words: alteration tailor?
A 9 inch rise is not a high rise. Most 32-34 inch waist people would consider a 10 inch rise on dress pants to be low to mid rise.
I've run into the same issue with most pants, however since I have a big booty from loads of squats/sprints, I have to size up to a 50 (34) or in some cases 52 (36) in Incotex and get the waist taken in. With these pants I generally have no issues with the jewels as long as I'm wearing undergarments which keep them in a tight package (boxer briefs and briefs). I do have a pair of pants from Zara which are actually cut to near perfection but alas, I haven't been able to find the style since and the poor construction is becoming evident now, a year later.
You seem to have experience with this kind of alteration.
It's a simple operation known as "taking out the crotch". There is usually some amount of fabric to let out unless the issue was so dramatic that you would not be able to even put them on in the first place. It is inexpensive at inexpensive tailors and more expensive at more expensive tailors. Doesn't really change the balance of the pants much except letting a bit out at the crotch to avoid moose-knuckles and other incongruities.
on the internet, everyone has too much meat for their pants
Thanks. Didn't even realize this was commonly done. Will talk to my man at L&S to see how much he charges for it. I'd be willing to pay $20 to make most of my currently embarrassing pants wearable.
I think it also had to do with the rise.