- Joined
- Feb 11, 2007
- Messages
- 26,710
- Reaction score
- 9,853
Brown is too small time to actually have a physical clubhouse.
STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
Brown is too small time to actually have a physical clubhouse.
The Park Central is roughly $350 per person more than we are currently spending.
Wait. What????!!?
Important point: So... what are the pros/cons of staying at a place like the Milburn, here: http://maps.google.com/maps?oe=utf-8...image&resnum=1
Real New Yorkers stay away from Times Square at all costs.
So do you consider yourself a real New Yorker?
So do you consider yourself a real New Yorker?
No. But I suppose you're going to take this opportunty to whine about me pretending to be, no matter what I've said.
No. But I suppose you're going to take this opportunty to whine about me pretending to be, no matter what I've said.
No. But I suppose you're going to take this opportunty to whine about me pretending to be, no matter what I've said.
WTH would I whine about anything. Do I come across as a whiner? I was just asking. Foo.
It takes about 6 minutes (plus walking and waiting time) to reach Times Square from the UWS by subway. You should, of course, see Times Square, but it is a cultural vacuum without anything worth doing unless you want to be stuffed in an immobile crowd of confused and bedazzled tourists caged in by Red Lobster, TGIF, and the Disney Store. Real New Yorkers stay away from Times Square at all costs.
My apologies if this has already been mentioned.
A saddening reference.
Would the Upper West Side work well for a stroll in the evening to a cafe or restaurant/something romantic? Would it be better than Times Square (I assume it would)?