Dakota rube
Stylish Dinosaur
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2005
- Messages
- 13,306
- Reaction score
- 237
So essentially your life is about nothing but sex?
No.
I think he's too busy lovin' himself to have any time left over for women.
UNIFORM LA CHILLICOTHE WORK JACKET Drop, going on right now.
Uniform LA's Chillicothe Work Jacket is an elevated take on the classic Detroit Work Jacket. Made of ultra-premium 14-ounce Japanese canvas, it has been meticulously washed and hand distressed to replicate vintage workwear that’s been worn for years, and available in three colors.
This just dropped today. If you missed out on the preorder, there are some sizes left, but they won't be around for long. Check out the remaining stock here
Good luck!.
STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
So essentially your life is about nothing but sex?
No.
Think of all the great men in history, that had their seminal moments prior to turning 30.
^obviously haven't made it all the way through Maslow, huh?
So essentially your life is about nothing but sex?
No.
Valid point.
I am pretty surprised by how many people in this thread equate a stable long-term relationship with the legal and social institution of marriage. You don't need the latter to have the former.
Perhaps not, but it calls into question your willingness to weather the difficult times in the former if you are unwilling to make the public commitment of the latter.
i love being married to my wife. read carefully, i said being married to my wife, not "married"
Sir, you have my envy. One day I intend to be you.
I am pretty surprised by how many people in this thread equate a stable long-term relationship with the legal and social institution of marriage. You don't need the latter to have the former.
No not at all. I can see how this comes off reading it over again; it does sound very immature.