SField
Distinguished Member
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2008
- Messages
- 6,139
- Reaction score
- 24
Well, the Bellagio is what was the image of kla$$y ten years ago, and the Wynn is basically the same, but for today. I am inured to what was, and still struggling with the new.
Really? To me the Bellagio actually looks horrendously cheap. The finish on areas where people don't look is incredibly bad. We were in a big suite overlooking the strip and if you look down to the roof it's so ugly, it looks like an industrial building. Everything is a facade, no attention to detail. Everyone that faces the strip can see this. They don't even bother to put plants. The put a few Cedars on pedestals for the people in the "villas" so they think they're a forrest behind their pool. To me it's so tacky and cynical. I find the Wynn to be less offensive and I enjoy the fact that a bunch of randoms don't show up to gawk as they do with the Bellagio. I was also very let down by the dining at the Bellagio. It's probably the worst of all the "prestige" hotels. The Wynn has them beat top to bottom. The buffett was shocking, I walked in and walked out. People had told me it's the best in Vegas and I had to go once, so I did. The Cafe Bellagio is literally like a horrific airport restaurant. I couldn't believe my eyes. There's many parts of that hotel that are like a 2 star hotel. It really just sucks, I have no desire to ever go back. Even their Cirque du Soleil show is worse than the Wynn's. The service at the Bellagio is also horrific. Their concierge made reservations TWICE for places that were closed, so we showed up and the restaurant was dark. I think I'll stay at the Mandarin next time, away from the throngs.