Women without hosiery . . .

[LabelKing]

She always manages to look terribly bourgeois and rather desperate-looking; her face also has that skin pulled over a knee effect and it appears, no makeup:

 

[Ivan Kipling]

LK, Anna Wintour would have to climb Mount Everest, to get to bourgeois.
She wouldn't be caught, dead, wearing a stocking . . . no, sir!

 

[LabelKing]

She is also a throughly unpleasant women, the archetype of "*****" apparently.

 

[texas_jack]

Whoa! I'd never heard of this woman till today. Apparently she sucks.

 

[LabelKing]

Originally Posted by texas_jack

Whoa! I'd never heard of this woman till today. Apparently she sucks.
She's the editor in chief of the influential but utterly derivative Vogue US.

 

[Ivan Kipling]

Yes, LAbelKing . . . Ms. Wintour is a joy to behold . . . on all, levels.

 

[Christofuh]

What half-sane heterosexual would want to see legs like hers covered ?

 

[Bill Brasky]

Originally Posted by Ivan Kipling

LK, Anna Wintour would have to climb Mount Everest, to get to bourgeois.
She wouldn't be caught, dead, wearing a stocking . . . no, sir!

Or a bra in this case. It appears her haircut is out of necessity, with skin pulled that taught, it has to gather somewhere!

 

[Bill Brasky]

Originally Posted by LabelKing

She always manages to look terribly bourgeois and rather desperate-looking; her face also has that skin pulled over a knee effect and it appears, no makeup:

Who is her cronie? She appears to be fresh from an internship at the Paramus Mall.

 

[LabelKing]

Originally Posted by Bill Brasky

Who is her cronie? She appears to be fresh from an internship at the Paramus Mall.
It's unsurprisingly the daughter who is an head of something at Teen Vogue, an utterly hideous spinoff. Just the name is enough.

 

[texas_jack]

Originally Posted by Christofuh

What half-sane heterosexual would want to see legs like hers covered ?


I'll vouch for the sexiness of hosiery, it's like lingerie for your legs.

 

[Ivan Kipling]

'I'm not wearing stockings . . . and there's nothing you can do about it.'

 

[Ivan Kipling]

 

[Quirk]

I think all we're showing here is that the hose-less look can be tasteful, sexy or trashy. Can't the same be said of any look?

Besides, sometimes, if you don't insist on having your women be "hose-less", you end up in this unfortunate situation:

 

[lawyerdad]

Originally Posted by Quirk

I think all we're showing here is that the hose-less look can be tasteful, sexy or trashy. Can't the same be said of any look?

Besides, sometimes, if you don't insist on having your women be "hose-less", you end up in this unfortunate situation:

So then you believe that the man should be the one with the "hosiery"? I see this thread going in an entirely different direction, and not an encouraging one . . .