STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
Santoni Boots ... Three-Years-Old...
I hae these boots
It will come as no suprise that I also hae these boots.
When Andrew was on Hiatus, back in January, everybody noticed
What would this board be without Andrew?
rnoldh;461520 said:What would this board be without Andrew?:QUOTE]
Only ha of what it is now.
well-kept;461594 said:What would this board be without Andrew?:QUOTE]
Only ha of what it is now.
Grt!!!
Be a lover. Be a Franophile.Don't be a haeta.
I hae everyone of those shoes, save Parson.
What's funny about it is that it could say either "I have" or "I hate" every one of those. Or just "I hae" them all.
John Lobb Marston in dark brown museum calf:
Santoni Boots ... Three-Years-Old...
John Lobb Marston in dark brown museum calf:
Now here is a shoe that looks better with a bit of wear. In its pristine state, I find it almost too delicate. But here, it looks great, and it's only going to get better.
What's so funny about that?
+1. The worn Marston looks as good, probably even better than when spanking new. It adds more characters and another dimension to it. It looks more organic. Perfect. The quality of a pair of well-made shoes can't be more apparent when they're worn for some time. This what separates boys from men.
I have seen seamless back from other makers such as Lattanzi and Vass. Is it more difficult to make shoes with seamless back?
What's so funny about that.Originally Posted by fritzl
I am sure it's just a typo that he meant "have."