• Hi, I am the owner and main administrator of Styleforum. If you find the forum useful and fun, please help support it by buying through the posted links on the forum. Our main, very popular sales thread, where the latest and best sales are listed, are posted HERE

    Purchases made through some of our links earns a commission for the forum and allows us to do the work of maintaining and improving it. Finally, thanks for being a part of this community. We realize that there are many choices today on the internet, and we have all of you to thank for making Styleforum the foremost destination for discussions of menswear.
  • This site contains affiliate links for which Styleforum may be compensated.
  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

    Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

Oh no...NYT: "Short-Sleeved Shirts, Nerdy but Nice, Are Back"

gorgekko

Distinguished Member
Joined
Sep 29, 2004
Messages
2,059
Reaction score
5
If I've ever needed a reason for my hatred of the New York Times -- and I have many -- this article is one of them. How many nitwits are going to point to that article and say, "See, I am cool."

No you aren't.
 

Margaret

Distinguished Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2006
Messages
1,259
Reaction score
1
No, I think those guys are cool.

The question is, why would someone imagine that to be a good thing?
tongue.gif
 

Jovan

Banned for Good
Joined
Mar 10, 2006
Messages
2,525
Reaction score
0
Originally Posted by gorgekko
If I've ever needed a reason for my hatred of the New York Times -- and I have many -- this article is one of them. How many nitwits are going to point to that article and say, "See, I am cool." No you aren't.
*another nail on the head picture goes here*
 

SGladwell

Distinguished Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2006
Messages
1,246
Reaction score
0
Originally Posted by gorgekko
If I've ever needed a reason for my hatred of the New York Times -- and I have many -- this article is one of them.

That's not entirely fair. The Times was kind enough to provide us with a list of so-called designers who are really just insipid finger-in-the-wind hacks whose work can be safely ignored: "Marc Jacobs, Thom Browne, Scott Sternberg of Band of Outsiders, Alexander McQueen, Michael Bastian."

(I already felt that way about Jacobs and Browne, as well as McQueen to some extent. Just add Sternberg and Bastian to the dustbin, which with that dumbass silhouette-logo sweater I already did to some degree with Bastian...)
 

Mr. Checks

Distinguished Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2006
Messages
1,253
Reaction score
2
Originally Posted by gorgekko
If I've ever needed a reason for my hatred of the New York Times -- and I have many -- this article is one of them. How many nitwits are going to point to that article and say, "See, I am cool."

No you aren't.


Can you imagine Gekko closing a deal in a short-sleeve shirt? Hail, no.
 

matadorpoeta

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2003
Messages
4,324
Reaction score
1
Originally Posted by whoopee
I don't think they're completly verboten. A fit (not very muscular but toned and thinnish), youngish guy could wear a fitted (hopeuflly bespoke) SS shirt with thin tie, tie clip, and slim trousers or (good) jeans and look cool.

gay.
 

Featured Sponsor

How important is full vs half canvas to you for heavier sport jackets?

  • Definitely full canvas only

    Votes: 97 37.6%
  • Half canvas is fine

    Votes: 93 36.0%
  • Really don't care

    Votes: 30 11.6%
  • Depends on fabric

    Votes: 43 16.7%
  • Depends on price

    Votes: 38 14.7%

Forum statistics

Threads
507,216
Messages
10,594,692
Members
224,392
Latest member
edunewsupdate
Top