• I'm happy to introduce the Styleforum Happy Hour, our brand new podcast featuring lively discussion about menswear and the fashion industry. In the inaugural edition, a discussion of what's going on in retail today. Please check it out on the Journal. All episodes will be also be available soon on your favorite podcast platform.

  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

pocketprotector

Active Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2010
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
Cordovan is rare. If it was all that great, wouldn't it be more popular?

They tell me 1) it doesn't crease 2) scuffs buff out far more easily than with leather 3) they last forever and keep looking new blah blah.

How much of this is legend vs reality?
 

SkinnyGoomba

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Jan 3, 2008
Messages
12,856
Reaction score
2,139
I've had a pair for over 2 years that are holding up very well. I really do my best to beat them to death and they dont even flinch.
 

RSS

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Apr 1, 2008
Messages
10,051
Reaction score
312
Is cordovan all that?

It's all that and much more.
 

musicguy

Distinguished Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2008
Messages
4,220
Reaction score
83
It's not rare... it's just expensive.

I know I'll get hate for it, but it almost always look plasticky to me. Who knows, maybe it'll grow on me later.
 

phoenixrecon

Distinguished Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2009
Messages
2,441
Reaction score
29
Originally Posted by pocketprotector
Cordovan is rare. If it was all that great, wouldn't it be more popular?

They tell me 1) it doesn't crease 2) scuffs buff out far more easily than with leather 3) they last forever and keep looking new blah blah.

How much of this is legend vs reality?


it takes 6 months to tan the hide that makes 1 pair of shoes.
they could tan a calf leather hide that makes like 4 pairs of shoes in an hour.

what makes more financial sense?
 

RSS

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Apr 1, 2008
Messages
10,051
Reaction score
312
Originally Posted by musicguy
I know I'll get hate for it, but it almost always look plasticky to me.
To appreciate it as it should be ... it takes a degree of sophistication some lack.
 

upnorth

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2007
Messages
1,503
Reaction score
13
I've seen some cordovan shells listed on ebay that cracked around the opening of the shoes. They are not all that die-hard fans have made it out to be but I certainly wouldn't do without them. Popularity is a tricky word here, they appeal to some people but at the same time, because as you say, they are rare and difficult and expensive to acquire, that surely has some effect on how "popular" it is.

Some like their distinct charateristics such as the "ripples" instead of microcreases on calfskin but to me, I prefer a buffet of various uppers, with calfskin, suede and cordovan in the top 3. I know their advantages and disadvantages and I find no need to lean to any single choice.
 

pocketprotector

Active Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2010
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
Well, it is certainly refreshing to hear that it is indeed good stuff. Most of the hype I've heard is from AE salespeople; naturally I'm reluctant to believe such a personally interested party
 

chasingred

Distinguished Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2009
Messages
1,190
Reaction score
5
I was skeptical until I handled some at a store.

I'm in the minority on this, but I think shell looks best when it's on boots. The ripples look off on "smaller" shoes such as loafers, and sometimes even overpowers oxfords and derbys. On boots, however, they can look just right.

Aside from construction and toughness, #8 shell cordovan really just has an incredibly, incredibly rich color in real life. You really ought to check them out at least.
 

Metlin

Distinguished Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2008
Messages
3,044
Reaction score
14
Can't speak for boots, but I love them on monkstraps. They can instantly dress "up" an outfit while looking cool.
 

patrickBOOTH

Stylish Dinosaur
Dubiously Honored
Joined
Oct 16, 2006
Messages
35,753
Reaction score
10,661
Originally Posted by Fab Style
Cordovan is just another type of leather. The only diff is that it is more porous making it more durable and softer

Originally Posted by phoenixrecon
less...

Yeah, it is less porous.

I remember when I first got into shoes and heard about cordovan I thought it would be the only kind of shoes I would ever buy again. For me its novelty as slightly worn off and I realized that it is best suited for certain applications as people mentioned above.

I think it looks great on boots, but if you really want a dressier shoe the pull up effect can be a little much, even in black, although adding character. It is also a chunkier leather and can be a bit inconsistant with ripples, and bubbles in certain areas. I just don't think it looks as sleek as calf and while producing its own kind of "glow" it doesn't shine up like calf does.
 

Raoul Duke

Senior Member
Joined
May 8, 2008
Messages
975
Reaction score
2
Originally Posted by pocketprotector
Cordovan is rare. If it was all that great, wouldn't it be more popular?

They tell me 1) it doesn't crease 2) scuffs buff out far more easily than with leather 3) they last forever and keep looking new blah blah.

How much of this is legend vs reality?


Well, the average person looks to spend $50-$100 on shoes. The cheapest new Shell Cordovan shoes are ~$500. To me, that explains why they are not popular amongst the general population.

I personally only like shell on wingtips, but that is just me. When the shoe is relatively plain, I find the rippling draws too much attention. On a wingtip, there is a lot going on design wise, so the creasing is less noticeable.
 

in stitches

Kung Joo
Spamminator Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Oct 10, 2010
Messages
69,954
Reaction score
32,966
Originally Posted by SpooPoker
Shell cordovan is alpha as fuck.

the new SF mantra
 

Featured Sponsor

How many pairs of shoes do you own?

  • 1 - 4

    Votes: 17 3.2%
  • 5 - 10

    Votes: 93 17.7%
  • 11 - 20

    Votes: 165 31.4%
  • 21 - 30

    Votes: 86 16.4%
  • 31 - 40

    Votes: 48 9.1%
  • 41 - 50

    Votes: 32 6.1%
  • 51 - 60

    Votes: 18 3.4%
  • 61 - 70

    Votes: 13 2.5%
  • 71 - 80

    Votes: 13 2.5%
  • 81 - 90

    Votes: 4 0.8%
  • 91 - 100

    Votes: 4 0.8%
  • 100+

    Votes: 32 6.1%

Related Threads

Forum statistics

Threads
427,667
Messages
9,203,307
Members
193,243
Latest member
dnls37043

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by

Top