• Hi, I am the owner and main administrator of Styleforum. If you find the forum useful and fun, please help support it by buying through the posted links on the forum. Our main, very popular sales thread, where the latest and best sales are listed, are posted HERE

    Purchases made through some of our links earns a commission for the forum and allows us to do the work of maintaining and improving it. Finally, thanks for being a part of this community. We realize that there are many choices today on the internet, and we have all of you to thank for making Styleforum the foremost destination for discussions of menswear.
  • This site contains affiliate links for which Styleforum may be compensated.
  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

    Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

Gaziano & Girling Appreciation & Shoe Appreciation Thread (including reviews, purchases, pictures)

TtownMD

Distinguished Member
Joined
May 4, 2015
Messages
7,412
Reaction score
4,545
You mean TG73, and burnham looks good
1f44c.png
1f44d.png
 
Last edited:

theundeadkennedy

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 12, 2010
Messages
171
Reaction score
20

I'd second ttownmd's advice that you're more or less in the same fit universe with a 9F versus a 9.5E - I normally take 9.5E with an addition on the instep because mine is high, but I have a ("standard") 9.5F Rothschild and a 9F Sinatra. The differences are subtle - noticeable, but I'm clearly within the 9-9.5 E/F fit universe and there'll always be an element of compromise with standard-fit non-bespoke shoes. Generally speaking, I'm happy with the 9.5E as my default, but I think the 9F will work better on the wholecut Sinatra since I expect the single piece of leather will eventually "give" more than pieces that are stitched together. The 9F feels/looks ever so slightly shorter (it could be psychological, I've not bothered to measure) and I feel like I have more or less the same room against the sole - where I feel a difference is over the vamp, where it fits more snugly, as I intend for a whole-cut. As far as the 9.5F for the Rothschilds versus my 9.5Es, to be honest I can't really tell much difference.

Hope that helps!


It definitely helps. I've never had to take a wider than standard fitting in a shoe before but I with your guys input I actually feel confident in the choice.

I wear a 9.5F in MH71. Last summer I tried on a 10E during a visit to SkoAB and it was certainly a no go. Too much volume especially in the forefoot which would cause excessive creasing over the vamp. Not worth the risk for a $1000+ shoe.


This definitely helps too. Much less worried about the potential lacing issue.


Thanks guys!!
 

in stitches

Stylish Dinosaur
Spamminator Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2010
Messages
66,397
Reaction score
33,106
I think all the lasts are great, but that certain lasts look better on certain shoes. Need to be chosen well to maximize the look of the given shoe, imo.
 

gmehra

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2015
Messages
300
Reaction score
185
Well there are two Deco Lasts - Deco Round and Deco Square. Both in general have a more aggressive toe but the Deco Round wouldn't be considered "chiseled"
 

Featured Sponsor

How important is full vs half canvas to you for heavier sport jackets?

  • Definitely full canvas only

    Votes: 100 36.8%
  • Half canvas is fine

    Votes: 98 36.0%
  • Really don't care

    Votes: 34 12.5%
  • Depends on fabric

    Votes: 44 16.2%
  • Depends on price

    Votes: 41 15.1%

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
507,716
Messages
10,597,774
Members
224,494
Latest member
Hazelwlalker
Top