STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
I would prefer the shoulders more extended. That way, you can have the same waisted silhouette without the waist being so constricting.
One thing I am not sure I fully understand is how the jacket appears to be moderately suppressed from the front, but much more severely suppressed from the back.
Voxy - do you mind elaborating some? I looked and looked and it seems to be suppressed around my natural waist. Too much maybe, but too high?
I don't want to over-interpret the photograph of the back, but this is an example where a focus on specific part of the the jacket (in this case, how the waist is suppressed) should give way to considerations of overall harmony and balance in the proportions. My suggestion, for what it's worth, would be to dial back the suppression a bit on your next number and then see if you still like it. Also, see if the back and double vents can be cut so that the vents are a bit closer together, and definitely make sure that they hang straight and don't kick out. Otherwise, it's pretty nice. - B
G... I think the new jacket looks pretty good, but it seems a little too tight all around. Letting the waist out a bit might help the vent lay flat. Also, you might want to check the collar height. Looks like it's sinking a bit low. The "hourglass" shape is not everyone's cuppa but I think it kinda goes with the uno-button. Doc Holliday might like it.
I would prefer the shoulders more extended. That way, you can have the same waisted silhouette without the waist being so constricting.
Nice use of the vintage kimono silk(?)...looks like the red fan fabric!
I don't want to over-interpret the photograph of the back, but this is an example where a focus on specific part of the the jacket (in this case, how the waist is suppressed) should give way to considerations of overall harmony and balance in the proportions. My suggestion, for what it's worth, would be to dial back the suppression a bit on your next number and then see if you still like it. Also, see if the back and double vents can be cut so that the vents are a bit closer together, and definitely make sure that they hang straight and don't kick out.
I also wonder how much of the additional "flare" in the skirt may be accentuated by the patterning of the fabric? For some of gshen's other numbers, made-up in plainer fabrics, the "flare" doesn't seem quite as pronounced... I do think it's also worth wearing a garment for a while before adjusting it any further, as it probably will take a while to settle... If you're comfortable in it and happy with it, whatever criticisms others' may offer is academic...
The real reason for the flare is G's been fattening up his ass during the varsity term break. I was at our MBT during several of the fitting & basting sessions and it looked fine and there was no flare. Sushi & whiskey sessions with PG and the Singapore SF Slingers, Rake magazine drinky poos for Ambrosi and Tiger beer chugging at our MBT just piles on the assage.
The lower-half vertical lines of the panes on the back shot seem plumb enough.
Yeah it is. It's just a wee bit lighter and springier than their usual stuff though. Not sure if it's worth the hassle or $$ to order it in future.