VeritasAequitas
Distinguished Member
- Joined
- May 19, 2017
- Messages
- 1,090
- Reaction score
- 4,946
Not wearing wingtips today but I just ordered some. Does that count?
STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
I've always said it's the thought that counts, and clearly you were thinking of wingtips if you ordered some, so yes; I believe it counts.Not wearing wingtips today but I just ordered some. Does that count? View attachment 1416318
I am not a fan. I like Rochester trees a lot better, because their sizing is more consistent, and they have a fuller, rounder heel. I have a couple pairs that I had AE trees in for a long time, that now appear elongated in the heel/ankle opening.What's everyone's experience with AE shoe trees? Every time I buy a new set its a different size than the last one. I have XXL splits that fit smaller than some XL, but also have some XXL that can't even get into a shoe even if I force the spring to be full compressed. It's crazy, never know what you'll get. Some on the solid wood ones too.
Just got a pair of XXL which should fit 13 EEE and up. Put them in my 13D shoes and the spring is barely engaged. I have another pair of XXL trees that I tried putting into 13 EEE shoes and they can't fit, even if you forced it.
Maybe just me?
+1 on Rochester trees*; much better-made trees than Woodlore, IMO. (My pet peeve with Woodlore trees is that they shed slivers of cedar into my shoes; not the happiest thing for a foot to run into...)I am not a fan. I like Rochester trees a lot better, because their sizing is more consistent, and they have a fuller, rounder heel. I have a couple pairs that I had AE trees in for a long time, that now appear elongated in the heel/ankle opening.
Fresh from the Warehouse Sale...Black MacNeil in 10 eee--from what I'm told the last pair in the system.
Initial impressions--great shoe (haha what else would I say?)
They don't make 'em like they used to...
Fresh from the Warehouse Sale...Black MacNeil in 10 eee--from what I'm told the last pair in the system.
Initial impressions--great shoe (haha what else would I say?) Really like how the 97 fits width wise. Compared to the 65, the shoe is indeed a bit longer and wider. Could I have sized down to a 9.5 eee? Maybe, but I ran the risk of putting my pinky toe in an uncomfortable spot. Worth the price at $395? Hard pass. At $134.84? Indeed.
The 2 "ultra specials" (or "unicorns" as Ashley calls them) from SC are with FedEx...hope to post pics when they arrive.
Hope you're all having swell days...(and if I have a "swell" day, we know the 97 last can handle the width...)
View attachment 1416372
Just took out the tape: about 1/8 longer and 1/8 wider...this could be a fluke, of course (or, some welt depth)...I compared to my Park Aves....97 last longer than 65? That's the first time I've heard that and it has not been my experience. I feel like 97 is TTS length wise and 65 runs a bit longer.
Looking good though!
You're also comparing reverse welt to flat welt, unless you were measuring the uppers with calipers?Just took out the tape: about 1/8 longer and 1/8 wider...this could be a fluke, of course (or, some welt depth)...I compared to my Park Aves....
Aaaaand... here they are!WEASEL ALERT
Merlot Hopkinsons, 247 on the site. I figured, nice day for a drive to Tysons to meet an SA, maybe get a hookup for 20% off, or at least give somebody a little commission. I met Steve, super cool guy. Told him my reason. When he rang the shoes up, they rang at 199.99. 20% off later, I had Hopkinsons on the way to my house for 169.58 including tax.
You're also comparing reverse welt to flat welt, unless you were measuring the uppers with calipers?
How's the lining (and footbed)? Really a step-up from the usual (e.g. Park Ave)?Aaaaand... here they are!
View attachment 1416386
A couple of things struck me:
1) I’m reminded why I’m not a Park Ave fan. Not much going on here, design-wise.
2) I can see why AE is phasing these out. While the leather inside and outside on the shoe appears to be higher quality than the main line, the craftsmanship is not. Note this picker near the right cap:
View attachment 1416387
On a $160 purchase, I don’t care. If I had paid full price, I wouldn’t have even put them on my feet.
overall a keeper, because of the price. Farewell, Independence line, I hardly knew ye.
Footbed is the same, although a pair of Bartletts I bought from dabondo1 on ebay a long time ago was noticeably better. Perhaps the company decided a long time ago, "we're phasing these out, let's just get them out the door however we have to, with whatever we have." The lining is much better though. Very smooth and very supple leather linings.How's the lining (and footbed)? Really a step-up from the usual (e.g. Park Ave)?