elbastardocalvo
Senior Member
- Joined
- Nov 1, 2011
- Messages
- 333
- Reaction score
- 10
Larchmont is definitely the most intriguing of the 333 shoes, IMHO. Gorgeous, especially in the dark brown.
STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
Larchmont is definitely the most intriguing of the 333 shoes, IMHO. Gorgeous, especially in the dark brown.
I wear a 11.5D in last #5 (Strand, McAllister, etc). Just had to size up to a 12D in the MacNeil's. The toebox was just too narrow. Anyone else or am I nuts?
I wear a 11.5D in last #5 (Strand, McAllister, etc). Just had to size up to a 12D in the MacNeil's. The toebox was just too narrow. Anyone else or am I nuts?
Am I the only one that wishes the Larchmont had closed lacing?
Thank you for posting the photos. Can you imagine the Larchmont in scotchgrain with a double sole?
Can you submit a Photoshoped version of that?
If only. I know nothing about photoshop. I just think think the lines of the shoe don't lend itself well to the open lacing it has.
I'm a total newb (see my handle) but I don't know if I've seen a long wing bal. Is there a good example?