• Hi, I am the owner and main administrator of Styleforum. If you find the forum useful and fun, please help support it by buying through the posted links on the forum. Our main, very popular sales thread, where the latest and best sales are listed, are posted HERE

    Purchases made through some of our links earns a commission for the forum and allows us to do the work of maintaining and improving it. Finally, thanks for being a part of this community. We realize that there are many choices today on the internet, and we have all of you to thank for making Styleforum the foremost destination for discussions of menswear.
  • This site contains affiliate links for which Styleforum may be compensated.
  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

    Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

apropos

Distinguished Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2008
Messages
4,461
Reaction score
402
A problem that IMO keeps cropping up in this thread is the shoehorning of business/work elements into casual fits, where they just... do not work.

Many members look like they tried to re-use parts of their work wardrobe in casual fits, or simply swapped out the colours of items in their ensemble, or worse, tried removing/modifiying a single element of a MC work fit in an attempt to 'casualise' it.

You have a fit with a navy jacket that for all intents and purposes looks conservative business dress workwear paired with... 'fun' belt and faded jeans. And then there are multiple examples of shirt wih sleeves left unrolled and collars buttoned up to -1, looking like you've lost your jacket somewhere along the way. And then a conservative business dress-which-has-lost-it's-way look, complete with balmoral shoe and worsted wool trou. And then there is that 'motorcycle' casual look, which has been forever seared into my retinas and which I swear I have seen before at Zara... in the women's section. :embar:

gshen IMO does a more than decent job - clothes are casual, style is casual, accessories are casual, colours are casual. Everything gels.

Just my 0.02
 
Last edited:

Scotty

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2011
Messages
118
Reaction score
6
?
Ok, just jeans, a polo and loafers... but I though we agree this gonna be "smart" or "business" casual, too.

 

aj_del

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2009
Messages
6,673
Reaction score
128
A problem that IMO keeps cropping up in this thread is the shoehorning of business/work elements into casual fits, where they just... do not work.

Many members look like they tried to re-use parts of their work wardrobe in casual fits, or simply swapped out the colours of items in their ensemble, or worse, tried removing/modifiying a single element of a MC work fit in an attempt to 'casualise' it.

You have a fit with a navy jacket that for all intents and purposes looks conservative business dress workwear paired with... 'fun' belt and faded jeans. And then there are multiple examples of shirt wih sleeves left unrolled and collars buttoned up to -1, looking like you've lost your jacket somewhere along the way. And then a conservative business dress-which-has-lost-it's-way look, complete with balmoral shoe and worsted wool trou. And then there is that 'motorcycle' casual look, which has been forever seared into my retinas and which I swear I have seen before at Zara... in the women's section.
shog[1].gif


gshen IMO does a more than decent job - clothes are casual, style is casual, accessories are casual, colours are casual. Everything gels.

Just my 0.02


+1, I have given up on trying to wear jeans with SCs. I have seen it done well on like 1% of the occasions it is done. I have stopped trying to be that 1%.
 

NotDickDiver

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2010
Messages
88
Reaction score
2

Originally Posted by acecow
I am with you, but not if it stops a lot of people from posting. I see a lot more inspirational fits in classical ensembles than casual ones. I'd like to see more of the latter. To get some new ideas. It would be cool if you'd cross-post from SW&D here. Your fits are always very interesting.

I could but, once again, if it becomes too precise its not like I fit in the theme.

I mean...

First thing that came to my mind when I saw this sorry crew.
 
Last edited:

Fuuma

Franchouillard Modasse
Joined
Dec 20, 2004
Messages
26,951
Reaction score
14,542

A problem that IMO keeps cropping up in this thread is the shoehorning of business/work elements into casual fits, where they just... do not work.

Many members look like they tried to re-use parts of their work wardrobe in casual fits, or simply swapped out the colours of items in their ensemble, or worse, tried removing/modifiying a single element of a MC work fit in an attempt to 'casualise' it.

You have a fit with a navy jacket that for all intents and purposes looks conservative business dress workwear paired with... 'fun' belt and faded jeans. And then there are multiple examples of shirt wih sleeves left unrolled and collars buttoned up to -1, looking like you've lost your jacket somewhere along the way. And then a conservative business dress-which-has-lost-it's-way look, complete with balmoral shoe and worsted wool trou. And then there is that 'motorcycle' casual look, which has been forever seared into my retinas and which I swear I have seen before at Zara... in the women's section. :embar:

gshen IMO does a more than decent job - clothes are casual, style is casual, accessories are casual, colours are casual. Everything gels.

Just my 0.02


The worst offense MCer do is when they have basically swap their dress slacks for raw jeans and now call this casual. If you're wearing a big ass tie, some stiff collared dress shirt, a blazer and some dress shoes you're not casual, you're confused.
 

Pembers

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2011
Messages
167
Reaction score
22
hdp0116.jpg


hdp0115.jpg


What is everyone's opinion on this, for a ridiculously cold July day? I think the jumper fits me less wel than I had thought before taking a photo of it.
 
Last edited:

Ianiceman

Timed Out
Timed Out
Joined
Jun 12, 2010
Messages
2,651
Reaction score
495
I like the idea of this thread, but page 11 alone shows the dangers of trying to find a middle ground between Apropos' comments regarding business wear with one item changed, and pics that really belong on SW&D.
 

cptjeff

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jan 19, 2010
Messages
4,637
Reaction score
330

I like the idea of this thread, but page 11 alone shows the dangers of trying to find a middle ground between Apropos' comments regarding business wear with one item changed, and pics that really belong on SW&D.


I don't think 'businesswear with one item changed' is anywhere near what people think of with MC casual. The way I think about it is casual clothing from the MC mindset. SW&D has a very different outlook on clothing. Pember's fit, in terms of it's approach, would go very well in that forum. Cuffed jeans, no collar, sweater that verges on the 'anti-fit' "ideal"...

Basically, I think of MC casual as a more mature understanding of casual dressing, ranging in formality from a step or two below business casual to a step below traditional business attire. There's going to be an overlap with some SW&D in there (see Fuuma's latest post), but it's not going to overlap with the four clowns on a street corner picture.
 
Last edited:

Scotty

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2011
Messages
118
Reaction score
6
I think we can stop debating if this thread should exist or not.

It's on page 11, if it works it will last, if not, it will desappear.

If we post picures and critic them (just like in regular WAYWRN thread): not only fit but also if it's too casual or too SW&D, eventually some"rules" will establish themselves... or maybe not. :embar:
 

Fuuma

Franchouillard Modasse
Joined
Dec 20, 2004
Messages
26,951
Reaction score
14,542

I don't think 'businesswear with one item changed' is anywhere near what people think of with MC casual. The way I think about it is casual clothing from the MC mindset. SW&D has a very different outlook on clothing. Pember's fit, in terms of it's approach, would go very well in that forum. Cuffed jeans, no collar, sweater that verges on the 'anti-fit' "ideal"...

Basically, I think of MC casual as a more mature understanding of casual dressing, ranging in formality from a step or two below business casual to a step below traditional business attire. There's going to be an overlap with some SW&D in there (see Fuuma's latest post), but it's not going to overlap with the four clowns on a street corner picture.


Well I'm one of the four clowns (who are very well dressed btw, you just don't know the codes) AND the one who posted a real relaxed fit with dress shoes and dress shirt a few posts above.

Another problem with mc casual: if you're wearing your regular gray dress slacks, dress shoes and a dress shirt you're just a guy who lost his jacket.
 

NAMOR

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Sep 3, 2010
Messages
20,430
Reaction score
3,488

A problem that IMO keeps cropping up in this thread is the shoehorning of business/work elements into casual fits, where they just... do not work.

looking like you've lost your jacket somewhere along the way.

gshen IMO does a more than decent job - clothes are casual, style is casual, accessories are casual, colours are casual. Everything gels.

Just my 0.02


Could you give examples of what this looks like? I work in a casual office environment and most men wear slacks and a dress shirt and no one looks like they lost their jacket. And I agree, gshen has excellent MC casual style. I have tried to adopt a few of his stylish points myself.

Well I'm one of the four clowns (who are very well dressed btw, you just don't know the codes) AND the one who posted a real relaxed fit with dress shoes and dress shirt a few posts above.

Another problem with mc casual: if you're wearing your regular gray dress slacks, dress shoes and a dress shirt you're just a guy who lost his jacket.


really? thats what comes to mind when you see a guy that is wearing slacks and dress shirt? really?
 

cptjeff

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jan 19, 2010
Messages
4,637
Reaction score
330

Well I'm one of the four clowns (who are very well dressed btw, you just don't know the codes) AND the one who posted a real relaxed fit with dress shoes and dress shirt a few posts above.


I don't care about the codes. To an outside observer, it looks like crap. If you need to be told something is supposed to look good in order for it to look good to you, it doesn't look good. The one a few posts above looks good, and is one of the ones I would say is in the overlap between MC casual and SW&D. The clothes mostly fit (SW&D's obsession with stacking confounds me), and are neatly presented. The colors are well coordinated. It's a nice outfit.
 
Last edited:

Featured Sponsor

How important is full vs half canvas to you for heavier sport jackets?

  • Definitely full canvas only

    Votes: 92 37.6%
  • Half canvas is fine

    Votes: 90 36.7%
  • Really don't care

    Votes: 26 10.6%
  • Depends on fabric

    Votes: 41 16.7%
  • Depends on price

    Votes: 38 15.5%

Forum statistics

Threads
506,953
Messages
10,593,108
Members
224,349
Latest member
jessejongenelen
Top