PeterMetro
Senior Member
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2002
- Messages
- 781
- Reaction score
- 2
STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
"Luke Simard of Cambridge looked dapper in this suit, hand-made in Thailand."
Ahahahahahahaha. I bet he got beaten up in the parking lot after the show."Luke Simard of Cambridge looked dapper in this suit, hand-made in Thailand."![]()
He's much better dressed than the winner of the previous heat, in my opinion. If you mean a little off in the head... yes. I really don't think it's possible to judge best-dressed based on one outfit - I would think 'best dressed' would encompass the ability to dress well for a variety of different occasions. Who knows, these guys might look like complete slobs the other 364 days of the year.Does the guy that won look a little off or is it just me?
Or our friend Luke might, well, look presentable?Who knows, these guys might look like complete slobs the other 364 days of the year.
He looks to me like a short-sleeve shirt with tie kind of guy. A well-meaning but clueless female friend has rented him some gear and has entered him into the contest to boost his confidence.Or our friend Luke might, well, look presentable?
I think you have to look at the people doing the judging. A guy who has the job of fashion editor at Esquire should be able to do better than a passe black blazer over a bland striped shirt unbuttoned to show an obscene amount of bare chest. Amateurs.How could that guy possibly have won? He looks like a freaking Banana Republic mannequin. Either choose someone well dressed, or choose someone creative. They chose neither.
That's when the contest moves to Connecticut.What? No popped collars?.