Gdot
Distinguished Member
- Joined
- Jun 14, 2011
- Messages
- 5,247
- Reaction score
- 294
STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
I have a pair of black Grenson Paul Stuart captoes that are indistinguishable from my EGs.
Wearing shoes of AE quality is already so far ahead of what's worn out there that only the nerdiest of clothing nerds will notice or care about what you're wearing.
^Anyone know who makes these? Don't say Kent Wang... I'd like to know the original manufacturer
^Anyone know who makes these? Don't say Kent Wang... I'd like to know the original manufacturer
DC Lewis
If this question is being asked, I would strongly consider taking baby steps up the ladder to Edward Green.
I would consider SHAPE to be the most important design criteria (quality issues aside). For with black shoes the shape becomes almost the only distinguishing feature aside from a fabulous polish.
I have two pairs of the old Grenson Handgrades from Paul Stuart in (1) black and (2) dark brown calfskin and suede. I would say the leather quality and craftsmanship equals EG, though there was no antiquing done. Though I also find their lasts very appealing, EG and JL really stand out from other makers such as C&J, Grenson, etc. primarily by virtue of the finishing (antiquing). Since antiquing is irrelevant on black shoes, I've decided that I won't pay more than C&J handgrade money for black shoes. YMMV.