Usonian
Senior Member
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2014
- Messages
- 239
- Reaction score
- 104
Interesting comment, if only because I don't think Thin Red Line was realistic per se...it's almost aggressively, hyper transcendental in it's portrayal of the ordinary. Having seen snippets and having read about his later movies, Thin Red Line is definitely a step towards the style Malick is known for now, with a combination of sweeping vistas but also tracking shots, intimate close-ups, and aggressive perspective. That combined with majestic, soaring scores is very powerful. Days of Heaven basically deploys the ultimate cheat code of shooting an entire movie during the Golden Hour - it's insanely beautiful, but not as intimate. The voiceover plays a much more interesting role in Days of Heaven, provided from a single perspective and used to drive some of the emotional currents of the movie in how the narrator perceives, or even misunderstands, the events happening around her In Thin Red Line it's a lot more schizophrenic, with every major actor billed getting a voiceover, oftentimes to the point where I wasn't sure who the voice over was from, and who it was necessarily for: the viewer? themselves? the person they're standing next to? Some of the voice over is also like, freshman dorm bong rip-level questions about "why do we fight, man." That said, I still liked it. It's gorgeous. I'll watch more of his movies.
I'll also mention that I actually only watched Days of Heaven because I watched David Gordon Green's George Washington and found it to be profoundly moving, and it's definitely one of my favorite contemporary films:
View attachment 1667427
It's on Criterion, and I'd highly recommend it if you like Malick. Green is definitely inspired by Malick in his cinematography and his use of voiceover here, and takes those tools to focus on a group of poor urban kids. I cannot recommend it enough. Here's a clip of David Lowery talking about it, who mentions Malick as a reference for Green:
Well that was a terrific little clip, I'll definitely have to check that out because it certainly looks right up my alley.
As for the realism comment, perhaps realistic isn't quite what I got from it, but there's something real about the emotion that he's able to communicate, and that specifically feels completely authentic to me, whether the story itself is realistic or not. whatever it is he's able to communicate, there's something in it that feels so relatable that I think few other directors are able to achieve.
I do think that's a great question to ask though, who is it for? Certainly one of the things I appreciate about the artistic process in general, whether the film was purely the exploration of a curiosity on Malick's end, or if he's poking all of the viewers to consider themselves, the actors/characters, or the film itself. I love me a movie that gets me thinking... or even if it doesn't, I love a movie that actually makes me feel something or consider something beyond "that was a fun movie."