STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
Not that it matters, but I disagree with this decision. Sometimes the best thing about threads like these is the ability to remind yourself of some of the stuff said on SF and to use those reminders as guideposts when reading future threads.
Can't sign in. It gives you a reason.
Can't sign in. It gives you a reason.
Hey- you guys voted not to ban him or time him out...There was a poll awhile back...+1. Knowing AF, he would just keep coming back for more. The thread in question should serve as a good source for "posterity" quotes, among other things.
this policy of redaction-as-enforcement has given us what, exactly? Is AF and the **** brigade going to stop? Because I see absolutely nothing that has changed in all his time here. These threads do not stop, and simple disappearing this stuff does nothing but encourage things to stay the same.
I'm sorry, but what you're doing is not working.
j, you ARE the most entertaining poster. No contest needed.
So I take it that my thread called "Why **************** so lazy and criminally inclined; an honest debate" wouldn't be popular? I'll have to stick with the one I'm preparing about "Why can't I call faggots; faggots while faggots can call faggots; faggots?"
1. Before reporting a post, gauge whether something is appropriate given the general tenor of the forum, not whether you find it personally offensive. For example, today, someone reported posts asking me to take down posts that broke the Commandment to "Not Take the Lord's Name in Vain." Dear member: "You evidently forgot that you were logged into Styleforum, not The 'Evangelical Bible Study forum'".