STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
Parking lot behind some bowling alley, lol.
WvG
Epaulet
CP (no vis)
J. Crew x Timex lol
Epaulet (no vis)
Paul Smith (no vis)
I'm a big fan of blocking out the face, since I think it often throws the proportions off when you have a full-body shot with the head chopped off. Most people have heads, you know? So it just looks little more natural to have a face full of pixels in a lot of cases. Some people do the head chop really well - NOBD comes to mind - so it's not like it's not a viable option. Just trickier.
IDK, Barims and BR are both operating at a pretty advanced level. It'd be a pretty big step to go out and buy a bunch of vintage designer stuff in the case of the former and a bunch of EG in the case of the latter, and it could be a big waste of money and wardrobe space if it doesn't work out.
It's probably distortion from the camera lens, but Biggskip looks like he's 6'6" with a 44" chest and 13" biceps. Proportions are funky.
Work on the guns, shave your head, wear all RO (9). Seriously though, everyone else has some pretty good suggestions.
clark kent, on behalf of styleforum, shut the **** up.
It's probably distortion from the camera lens, but Biggskip looks like he's 6'6" with a 44" chest and 13" biceps. Proportions are funky.
Work on the guns, shave your head, wear all RO (9). Seriously though, everyone else has some pretty good suggestions.
clark kent, on behalf of styleforum, shut the **** up.