STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
The captoe/rest of shoe proportion look better on those than other Park Avenues.Continuing with the browns, Park Aves 2day:
Initial Florsheim NOS unboxing photo. Better ones later.
View attachment 983733
Edit. All spiffed up and ready for the shoe bags.
View attachment 983806
View attachment 983807
Initial Florsheim NOS unboxing photo. Better ones later.
View attachment 983733
Edit. All spiffed up and ready for the shoe bags.
View attachment 983806
View attachment 983807
Would you say they fit .5 size large or TTS?
Would you say they fit .5 size large or TTS?
I have a 93602, so different style Florsheim, and a low volume foot. I brannock 12C and find that size shoe fits me great. Go TTS.In my experience, they are TTS. But others should weigh in as well. Some people with low volume feet may need to down size as I have a high volume foot.
i would say you should be okay TTS as well, although my 11D 93605 shell seem to be slightly roomier than my 93602's in the same size. Not enough to probably warrant an adjustment, but it seems the shell is a tad looser for me in my small sample size of two pair.I have a 93602, so different style Florsheim, and a low volume foot. I brannock 12C and find that size shoe fits me great. Go TTS.