• Hi, I am the owner and main administrator of Styleforum. If you find the forum useful and fun, please help support it by buying through the posted links on the forum. Our main, very popular sales thread, where the latest and best sales are listed, are posted HERE

    Purchases made through some of our links earns a commission for the forum and allows us to do the work of maintaining and improving it. Finally, thanks for being a part of this community. We realize that there are many choices today on the internet, and we have all of you to thank for making Styleforum the foremost destination for discussions of menswear.
  • This site contains affiliate links for which Styleforum may be compensated.
  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

    Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

The Look goes on...

covskin

Distinguished Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2014
Messages
1,925
Reaction score
1,933
Agree cerneabbas, the 'in between' is dynamic, confounds expectations and takes a bit of work. Not so much a twist, more an untwist!
 
Last edited:

cocostella

Distinguished Member
Joined
May 9, 2007
Messages
4,132
Reaction score
2,610
Must admit I go for my old full mod revival look sometimes. Sat. night I wore a kelly green FP with white tipping, trim black moleskin trousers at proper length/hem-width, white dress socks and modern (longer toe-box/vamp) black Paul Smith penny loafers. Basically, the same thing I'd wear back in 80' (substituting the PS loafers instead of tasseled Weejuns). I'm fairly slim, with a full head of hair, mind... Usually I don't go so straight at this look and vary one or two of the elements. Sometimes, I say screw it and go full-on.
 
Last edited:

covskin

Distinguished Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2014
Messages
1,925
Reaction score
1,933
That doesn't sound so bad cocostella, a fair bit away from the parka, target and badges look. The hair though...?
 
Last edited:

Mr Knightley

Distinguished Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2013
Messages
3,788
Reaction score
10,432
A couple of days off and the thread has gone wild!

Lots of good points including the old chestnut - how far do you go in trying to replicate a look from 30 or 45 or 50 years ago? I think the consensus here is you take elements of the Look and embrace them in your style.

Every now and then a full-on look seems just right though. On Sunday I popped down the shops in Combat (MiE) navy Harrington, 501s, J Crew red, blue and white checked BD, M&S cotton slipover v neck in marled grey and Bass beefroll weejuns in burgundy. Pure 1970.

Just picking up on ‘smart’ one of the things I loved about 1968 – 70 was the idea implicit in the skinhead movement that you had to master the art of dressing well in any setting. The immaculate Harrington, jeans or sta prest and Royal brogues out shopping or on the terraces at Arsenal and then in the evening at Ilford Palais a dogtooth suit with crisp white OCBD, paisley silk tie and plain Royals or loafers.

In some ways the 1980s was the same (for me). During the day it might be a long sleeve PS polo with rugby style quarters in multi colours, Italian chinos and loafers and at night or in the office a Boss DB suit with Armani tie and classic Oxford shoes.

Today men struggle to cross over in the same way – assuming they dress well at all, of course!!
 

cocostella

Distinguished Member
Joined
May 9, 2007
Messages
4,132
Reaction score
2,610

The hair though...?
Guess I just brought it up as I was attempting to paint a picture and the hair can be such an integral part of "the look." Certainly didn't mean it as a jab at the more "follicly challenged," though upon review I can see how it might have been taken that way. Apologies, if so.
 
Last edited:

cerneabbas

Distinguished Member
Joined
May 7, 2013
Messages
2,670
Reaction score
2,015
A couple of days off and the thread has gone wild!

Lots of good points including the old chestnut - how far do you go in trying to replicate a look from 30 or 45 or 50 years ago? I think the consensus here is you take elements of the Look and embrace them in your style.

Every now and then a full-on look seems just right though. On Sunday I popped down the shops in Combat (MiE) navy Harrington, 501s, J Crew red, blue and white checked BD, M&S cotton slipover v neck in marled grey and Bass beefroll weejuns in burgundy. Pure 1970.

Just picking up on ‘smart’ one of the things I loved about 1968 – 70 was the idea implicit in the skinhead movement that you had to master the art of dressing well in any setting. The immaculate Harrington, jeans or sta prest and Royal brogues out shopping or on the terraces at Arsenal and then in the evening at Ilford Palais a dogtooth suit with crisp white OCBD, paisley silk tie and plain Royals or loafers.

In some ways the 1980s was the same (for me). During the day it might be a long sleeve PS polo with rugby style quarters in multi colours, Italian chinos and loafers and at night or in the office a Boss DB suit with Armani tie and classic Oxford shoes.

Today men struggle to cross over in the same way – assuming they dress well at all, of course!!
I definitely think that you are right Mr Knightley,people just don't make any effort at all on any occasion now,A couple of years ago I was on a plane and an English couple got on in their late 50s early 60s the man was wearing shapeless jeans, bad enough but they had paint splashes on them !. A bloke that I know went to a funeral and a man turned up wearing a tracksuit !.

There doesn't seem to be that difference in daywear/streetwear and special occasion/Saturday night out clothes any more,in fact I would bet that a high percentage of men in Britain only have jeans and trainers and don't own a pair of trousers or shoes.
 

covskin

Distinguished Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2014
Messages
1,925
Reaction score
1,933

Guess I just brought it up as I was attempting to paint a picture and the hair can be such an integral part of "the look." Certainly didn't mean it as a jab at the more "follicly challenged," though upon review I can see how it might have been taken that way. Apologies, if so.


Haha, no offence taken cocostella though I am having to cut it a bit shorter these days! Was just wondering if you went for the mod revivalist 'Weller' hairstyle or something else.
 

cocostella

Distinguished Member
Joined
May 9, 2007
Messages
4,132
Reaction score
2,610
Yup. About like this... without the violet spotlights, of course!
400
 

cocostella

Distinguished Member
Joined
May 9, 2007
Messages
4,132
Reaction score
2,610
True. Basically a grown out crop, with a little length on sides and back. When it gets to long, I end up looking more like a Faces era Ron Wood... big schnoz and all.
 

cerneabbas

Distinguished Member
Joined
May 7, 2013
Messages
2,670
Reaction score
2,015
Picked this up at a "vintage clothing boutique" recently, not my size but couldn't pass it up. A bit skinhead, a bit casual. Can anyone date it? Maybe wore it, way back when.





A funny coincidence,I came across these jackets for sale on 80s casual classics,so it looks like some Casuals wore them in the 80s. I hadn't realised that Lois were a Spanish make (guess the bull logo should have been a clue) or that they (Lois) are still making jeans now.
 

cerneabbas

Distinguished Member
Joined
May 7, 2013
Messages
2,670
Reaction score
2,015
Spanish but surprise, surprise not made in Spain any more.
I suppose that we would be more surprised if they were still made in Spain.

I noticed on that 80scasuals site polos and track tops by Sergio Tacchini,I remember that their stuff was pretty popular and I thought expensive for what it was,looking online at their polos now I thought that quite a lot of them were very cheap,turns out that the cheap ones are 65% polyester,not the ideal material for a hot summer day.

I wasn't keen on the tennis based Casual look,in fact where Casual went wrong for me was being so brand orientated,lots of people just thought that wearing any old crap by Ellese Fila etc etc made a good look because they were the 'in' brands and expensive so their gear must be/look great,not so IMO.
In fact I will go further and say that Casual was responsible for the Chav 'look'.

I was out and about yesterday and I was remembering the days when I would go out and notice what people were wearing in a positive way,many times noticing someone wearing a jacket or shoes and thinking now that's nice,that has not happened for a very long time now.
Sorry to be so negative,I think the winter is getting to me roll on the spring.
 

covskin

Distinguished Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2014
Messages
1,925
Reaction score
1,933

In fact I will go further and say that Casual was responsible for the Chav 'look'.


I agree with this a thousand times over. It was the mid-80s tracksuit bottoms that marked the start of the chav look in my view, a look continued through the hideous late 80s shellsuit and into the braindead, cannabis-smoking, baseball-capped bumpkin we are all familiar with.
 
Last edited:

cerneabbas

Distinguished Member
Joined
May 7, 2013
Messages
2,670
Reaction score
2,015
There is a sale at Outdoor and Country at the moment,Barbour and Baracuta jackets well reduced.
 

Featured Sponsor

How important is full vs half canvas to you for heavier sport jackets?

  • Definitely full canvas only

    Votes: 92 37.2%
  • Half canvas is fine

    Votes: 90 36.4%
  • Really don't care

    Votes: 27 10.9%
  • Depends on fabric

    Votes: 42 17.0%
  • Depends on price

    Votes: 38 15.4%

Forum statistics

Threads
507,006
Messages
10,593,409
Members
224,354
Latest member
K. L. George
Top