I am not an expert, but I am an engineer by trade, which makes me curious to analyze all sorts of things. One thing I am not sure I understand though is resoling of shoes and boots. Now, don't get me wrong, I do understand the basics. Resoling a quality shoe means you can restore an old shoe to near-new condition, maintaining some of the break-in aspects of it that you love. However, I am not sure I believe that resoling a shoe makes sense in many cases with "cheaper" shoes and boots.
For example, say you have a quality AE shoe that retails for $425. You may have gotten it on sale for $250 or as a factory second for cheaper, but let's not consider that too deeply here. You love the shoe and wore it pretty heavily. The leather is well broken in, and the shoe has molded to the shape of your foot. But the sole is gone. You can send this shoe back to AE and have it recrafted for $125. The leather will be restretched and refinished, and the outsole will be replaced with a brand new one. Your shoe will retain its molded shape to your feet in the insole. With the exception of the refinishing of the leather removing the patina, this seems like a terrific deal. For $125, you get back your shoe in nearly $425 condition. Yes, I realize some creases will remain, and some things are not redrafted; but, in all, you are getting a lot of value back for that $125. Getting a new shoe would cost $250 on sale and $425 regular, so this makes sense.
Now consider another example. You have a pair of $200 Thursday boots or shoes. Thursday products are also goodyear welted and resoleable. I am not aware of an internal Thursday recrafting program, so I assume you have to pay an independent cobbler. I assume you won't be taking it to Kirby Allison for the $165 tag, so perhaps you can get this done for $100 elsewhere. You would be restoring the shoe to a like-new condition, but is it really worth it? The brand new shoe (no sale pricing needed) is $200. For $100, you are not getting the manufacturers original sole. Your shoe isn't being worked on by the company that made it and understands that shoe the best. Why would you do this instead of just buying a $200 new shoe?
Then the question becomes--why would you AT ALL buy the Thursday shoe? Let's say the $200 Thursday shoe is identical to the AE $425 shoe, though I admit AE is higher quality generally. For a one-time price of $425, you can recraft it several times for $125 each time with the AE. But with the Thursday shoe, you will spend $200 each time, since it just isn't worth it to recraft. After three recraftings, with the AE, you have spent $425 + $125 + $125 + $125 = $800. After three "new" purchases of the Thursday shoes, you have spent $200 + $200 + $200 + $200 = $800. It's the same cost! It would seem then that buying the AE makes more sense if it is actually a better shoe anyway.
Thoughts?
For example, say you have a quality AE shoe that retails for $425. You may have gotten it on sale for $250 or as a factory second for cheaper, but let's not consider that too deeply here. You love the shoe and wore it pretty heavily. The leather is well broken in, and the shoe has molded to the shape of your foot. But the sole is gone. You can send this shoe back to AE and have it recrafted for $125. The leather will be restretched and refinished, and the outsole will be replaced with a brand new one. Your shoe will retain its molded shape to your feet in the insole. With the exception of the refinishing of the leather removing the patina, this seems like a terrific deal. For $125, you get back your shoe in nearly $425 condition. Yes, I realize some creases will remain, and some things are not redrafted; but, in all, you are getting a lot of value back for that $125. Getting a new shoe would cost $250 on sale and $425 regular, so this makes sense.
Now consider another example. You have a pair of $200 Thursday boots or shoes. Thursday products are also goodyear welted and resoleable. I am not aware of an internal Thursday recrafting program, so I assume you have to pay an independent cobbler. I assume you won't be taking it to Kirby Allison for the $165 tag, so perhaps you can get this done for $100 elsewhere. You would be restoring the shoe to a like-new condition, but is it really worth it? The brand new shoe (no sale pricing needed) is $200. For $100, you are not getting the manufacturers original sole. Your shoe isn't being worked on by the company that made it and understands that shoe the best. Why would you do this instead of just buying a $200 new shoe?
Then the question becomes--why would you AT ALL buy the Thursday shoe? Let's say the $200 Thursday shoe is identical to the AE $425 shoe, though I admit AE is higher quality generally. For a one-time price of $425, you can recraft it several times for $125 each time with the AE. But with the Thursday shoe, you will spend $200 each time, since it just isn't worth it to recraft. After three recraftings, with the AE, you have spent $425 + $125 + $125 + $125 = $800. After three "new" purchases of the Thursday shoes, you have spent $200 + $200 + $200 + $200 = $800. It's the same cost! It would seem then that buying the AE makes more sense if it is actually a better shoe anyway.
Thoughts?